AI Rate Professor

Humanities

John Scholte

REL140 · RELIGION140 · RELG140 · RELI140 · HUMAN110 · HUM110 · HUM130 · HU110 · HIST · RELG120 · EASTASIANHUM · RELG130 · RELG110 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take him if you , and want an interesting humanities or religion class with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerEasy A With AttendanceWriting HeavyHelpful and ReasonableLecture Notes Matter
  • Students usually praise him as passionate, knowledgeable, helpful, and engaging.
  • Getting an A is very realistic, but , and writing matter.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because some students liked the structure while one found instructions vague and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Many students call it an easy A or B, but the A , and participation.

, while online reviews suggest manageable grades but more need for self-direction.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is usually made understandable and interesting, but , and lecture notes add real effort.

In-person evidence emphasizes clear lectures and easy exams, while online and vague assignment directions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and can affect the grade.

Attendance strictness is clearly supported in in-person reviews, while online reviews focus .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students recommend him because , and makes humanities or religion engaging.

, while online sentiment is mostly positive but includes one major organization complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report , and strong grades for steady participation.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize lenient grading through attendance and participation, while and .

Workload

Moderate

57/100

The workload is doable but , and sometimes a long paper.

Format shift

Online workload is described as doable but discussion-heavy, while , and writing.

Teaching experience

Excellent

89/100

Students consistently describe him as passionate, knowledgeable, helpful, and able to make the subject interesting.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger and more consistent, while online teaching is more mixed because of organization issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment combines , and occasional discussions.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, participation, discussions, and a paper; , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his passion, helpfulness, and fair structure, while , and participation are important.

Main concern

The class can be lecture-heavy, writing-heavy, and attendance-dependent.

What students said

“Structure of class consists of and two tests. EASY A.”
RELG140
“You are SURE to get an A in this class if you simply show up.”
HUM130
“It's a lot of writing but it is very doable.”
REL140

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but mostly positive, with and manageable work offset by one complaint about vague directions and Canvas organization.

Main concern

Some online students may need to work independently with limited clarity or feedback.

What students said

“The final and nice.”
relg120
“his extremely vague assignment details, lack of canvas organization, and consistent instructions to "find the answers on your own" made this class more miserable than it should've been.”
relg120
“The class is graded on a few things, you will have 2 tests and participation on all the topics you learn.”
RELG130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mostly student-friendly because reviews mention lecture-note tests, reviews before exams, and , though many exams are written essays.

Open-Book Exam EvidenceLecture-Note ExamsEssay ExamsTwo Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , and one explicit open-book use of lecture notes and books.

Open-Book Exam EvidenceWritten ExamsExam ReviewsMidterm and Final
“Lets students use Lecture Notes and !”
EASTASIANHUM
“He goes over everything that might be on the .”
RELG140
“ papers.”
REL140

Online

Online reviews mention midterm and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book status.

Lecture-Note MidtermLecture-Note FinalTwo Tests
“The final and nice.”
relg120
“you will have 2 tests and participation on all the topics you learn.”
RELG130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Scholte is probably my favorite I've taken in my years at Grossmont.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

89/100

“Professor Scholte is probably my favorite I've taken in my years at Grossmont.”

📈 Grade Ease

86/100

“You are SURE to get an A in this class if you simply show up.”

🧾

80/100

“Lets students use Lecture Notes and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I hated History until I took his class. I learned to LOVE it.
  • One of the such a diverse topic.
  • He teaches on the side because he loves it. Makes the material easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A or B! Come to class , do your weekly reading and ! You'll pas for sure!
  • It's a lot of writing but it is very doable.
  • You are SURE to get an A in this class if you simply show up.

Theme 3

🧾

  • The final and nice.
  • Lets students use Lecture Notes and !
  • Structure of class consists of and two tests. EASY A.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Format

  • Nice professor and had an easily doable workload for an 8-week accelerated course
  • his extremely vague assignment details, lack of canvas organization, and consistent instructions to "find the answers on your own" made this class more miserable than it should've been.
  • There were two discussions per week which really made you think but were never terrible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 29 reviews across online and in-person formats with rich, repeated , and exams.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

REL1405 reviews
HUM1104 reviews
RELG1404 reviews
HUM1303 reviews
HU1102 reviews
Show 8 more courses
relg1202 reviews
RELI1402 reviews
RELIGION1402 reviews
EASTASIANHUM1 review
HIST1 review
HUMAN1101 review
RELG1101 review
RELG1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values