AI Rate Professor

English

Kristin McGregor

ENG98 · ENG2976 · ENG098 · ENG124 · ENGL124 · ENG120 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want supportive English instruction and can keep up with regular reading and writing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring teacherWriting heavyHelpful feedbackFlexible late workMixed online experience
  • Most in-person students describe her as sweet, helpful, and .
  • The class usually involves substantial reading and writing, but many students find it manageable.
  • The single online review is sharply negative and , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with attention and completed work, but writing volume and one harsh online review keep it from being effortless.

fair, while the lone online review reports an F and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course material is generally approachable because , but , and journals require steady work.

, while online evidence suggests a much harder experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an , though late work flexibility is explicitly praised.

, and the strongest flexibility evidence comes from in-person late-work and revision comments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and helpful, but the negative online review and one boring-class comment lower confidence.

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, while the only online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and easy A comments point to forgiving grading outside the negative online review.

Format shift

, while the online review labels her a .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The , and discussion work, but several students say it is manageable if completed on time.

Format shift

In-person workload is regular but manageable, while the online review describes so and test heaviness.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most comments praise her kindness, helpfulness, feedback, and negatives.

Format shift

, while the only online review is very negative and lacks teaching detail.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

, and revisions dominate the assessment evidence more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention writing-heavy work, while online also includes a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students , and beginner-friendly explanations.

Main concern

Some students say there is a lot of writing and reading, and one says she can be boring.

What students said

“There is a lot of writing in her course but if you actually do the .”
ENG120
“I am terrible at english, but so well.”
ENG098

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is extremely negative and describes the course as , and harshly graded.

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one very negative review with little detail.

What students said

“she's the worst. Literally the worst.”
ENGL124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and mixed, with one online test-heavy tag and but .

Test Heavy MentionedQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Quizzes Mentioned
“ and journals but they're not hard if you read the material and watch the movies.”
ENG124
“The quizes are what she say they'll be.”
ENG98

Online

The online review has a test-heavy tag but does not clearly prove .

Test Heavy MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“she's the worst. Literally the worst.”
ENGL124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a really sweet teacher and very helpful. I am terrible at english, but so well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She's a really sweet teacher and very helpful. I am terrible at english, but so well.”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“There is a lot of writing in her course but if you actually do the .”

⚖️

74/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super nice and caring professor.
  • she is a great teacher.
  • so well.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • There is a lot of writing in her course but if you actually do the .
  • We had to read a book, watch movies and read short stories.
  • The .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • easy A :))
  • super chill, really EASY A if you pay attention.
  • If you want an easy A or .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide useful but limited evidence, with and one sharply negative online review.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1202 reviews
ENG982 reviews
ENG0981 review
ENG1241 review
ENG29761 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values