AI Rate Professor

Art

Jeff Kahn

ART175 · ART171 · ART177 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you want a and reward steady project effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent feedbackFair gradingOrganized projectsSkill-building critiquesStudio time matters
  • Students , and art expertise.
  • Grades are viewed as fair, with and .
  • The course is not effortless because students must use studio time and work outside class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

High grades are common and , but students need , and spend time outside class.

Both formats show fair outcomes, while and project effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is approachable with strong demos and feedback, but , and sometimes challenging.

Online evidence emphasizes personal improvement, while but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

, but students repeatedly say to attend and use studio time to work.

Both online and and studio progress, with no strict policy proven.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and critiques noticeably improve their art skills.

Both formats are highly positive, though online has only one review and in-person has stronger evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

78/100

Students describe grading as fair and to completed work and .

Format shift

, while the online review supports growth through feedback.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Assignments are reasonable and well structured, but students must spend time outside class and .

Format shift

, while the online review stresses attending and using studio time.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Reviews consistently praise his feedback, critiques, organization, demos, knowledge, and care for students.

Format shift

and care, with in-person reviews adding stronger evidence of organization and demos.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and studio work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students praise his organization, fair grading, demos, critiques, and .

Main concern

Students should expect to and use class time productively.

What students said

“Be prepared to spend time outside of class working on assignments and use your time in class.”
ART175
“ , and he gives good demos on the computer software and processes you need to do.”
ART171

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is highly positive and .

Main concern

The online evidence is only one review, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“My art got so much better after this time in the class .”
ART175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, open-book .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and critiques and do not clearly prove exam policies.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“My art got so much better after this time in the class .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student growth. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“My art got so much better after this time in the class .”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“Absolutely loved this class!”

⚖️

78/100

“Things were always graded fairly, and he gave great advice during critiques and encouraged student input and discussion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • .
  • He will give you a great critique for your skill level, no matter what it is.
  • Gives good .

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects and Work

  • Be prepared to spend time outside of class working on assignments and use your time in class.
  • and painting were very reasonable and the time frame for completing them was great.
  • , but challenging, also.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • and passionate about art.
  • He cares a lot about his students and wants to make sure you're .
  • Great professor. and super kind.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews are consistent and detailed enough to be credible, but the online format has only one review and several comments are older.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1715 reviews
ART1753 reviews
ART1771 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values