AI Rate Professor

Art

Ethan-Neil Kendricks

ART124 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you can self-direct, tolerate weak structure, and only need a manageable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRepetitive lecturesPoor structureEasy gradesLow teaching valueParticipation pressure
  • Students , and limited actual teaching.
  • Grades appear easy, but students say the learning experience is weak.
  • There are no online reviews, and all evidence comes from in-person ART124 reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A-range, and reviews suggest few graded items, but the easy grade comes with poor teaching value.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The assignments seem manageable, but poor structure and the grades suggest.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person ART124 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students describe being scolded for not paying attention and participation during critiques appears important.

and participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students do not recommend him because they report , and little learning.

All recommendation evidence is negative and comes from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

A-range grades and comments about few graded items suggest grading is generous even when teaching quality is poor.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload does not sound heavy, but and poor class structure create friction.

Format shift

, and they focus more on structure than volume of work.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly say he lectures repetitively, talks about himself, and does not teach much beyond occasional demos.

Format shift

All , and it is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative about structure, teaching quality, repeated lectures, and classroom experience despite high grades.

Main concern

Students say he talks about himself, repeats the , and provides little useful instruction.

What students said

“the class lacked a .”
ART124
“This dude said the exact same 5 things over and over the entire semester.”
ART124
“He doesn't really teach other than a quick demo every once in a while.”
ART124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do , and assessment appears based on art assignments and critiques rather than exams.

No Clear Exam EvidenceAssignment-Based Art WorkFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

75/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or finals, and instead describe assignments, critiques, and few graded items.

AssignmentsCritiquesFew Graded Items
“Although I enjoyed the assignments and trips we took”
ART124
“Graded by few things”
ART124
“He scolds you if you're doing anything other than listening or .”
ART124

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't really teach other than a quick demo every once in a while.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom expectations; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He doesn't really teach other than a quick demo every once in a while.”

📋 Class Structure

30/100

“the class lacked a .”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Graded by few things”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This dude said the exact same 5 things over and over the entire semester.
  • He mostly talks about himself, and if not that, irrelevant subjects.
  • He doesn't really teach other than a quick demo every once in a while.

Theme 2

📋 About Structure

  • the class lacked a .
  • The class schedule kept changing
  • there wasn't much time to work because it was spent lecturing and talking about himself

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Assessment

  • Graded by few things
  • Although I enjoyed the assignments and trips we took
  • Never learned anything beyond the 15 still life's from charcoal from the $100 kit

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 4 reviews, including a duplicated review, but the complaints are recent and highly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1244 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values