AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Theoni Harrisburg

CSIS297 · CSIS296 · CSIS160 · CSCI110 · CSIS165 · CSIS110 · CISC192 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can teach yourself and mainly want a possible easy grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesFrequent rantsEasy gradingSelf-taught learningPoor support
  • Most students describe lectures as unfocused rants with little useful course instruction.
  • Grades can be easy in some sections, but grading and .
  • Students who want structured teaching or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students earned A , but inconsistency and poor organization add risk.

The easy-grade evidence is mostly in person, while but less grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is not always hard, but , and some impossible labs make the course feel harder.

Online work is described as not hard but disjointed, while difficult labs.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance expectations vary, with and others saying deadlines and attendance are loose.

Online evidence mentions early attendance tracking, while every other two weeks.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend the professor because lectures are unfocused, help is limited, and .

Both online and few older or isolated positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Some reviews describe very easy grading and , but others report tough or .

Format shift

, while online reviews do not clearly establish grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

as manageable, but and disorganization increase the real workload.

Format shift

Online reviews call homework not hard, while in-person , and difficult labs.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and unrelated to the course material.

Format shift

Both formats report poor lecture quality, with in-person reviews giving the strongest and most repeated evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and few graded items more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point more toward coursework and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing irrelevant lectures, poor organization, and limited help despite some easy grades.

Main concern

Students often say they learned from the book or Google instead of class.

What students said

“Everything I learned in this class was through a textbook and google.”
CSIS296
“If you read the textbook and submit the .”
CSIS165

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and mostly self-directed work with unclear connection to the textbook.

Main concern

Students report erratic presentation and lectures that do not match course work.

What students said

“The , but she is all over the place.”
CISC192
“Lectures = rants, and advice about life.”
CSCI110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, or closed-book policy.

Exam policy unclearFinals mentionedAssignments emphasized

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Finals mentionedExam policy unclear
“Not done with the course yet but it's coming time for finals.”
CSIS297

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to get a really easy A (79% or higher is an A with lots of , but if you want to learn programming, don't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I have never had such an .”

📈 Easy Grade Risk

78/100

“Our class all got an A because by the end of the semester she had lost track of everything.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ unless you don't want to learn anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are mixed with rants and random images of old computers.
  • She lectures non-stop about millennials, her life, her military career, movies, and just about everything but the course topic.
  • The rest of the class is her ranting about millenials, communists, music, Microsoft, etc.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • .
  • With a little work and attending lecture you'll get an A, however, you won't actually learn anything from class.
  • Expects perfect c++ skills for something you should know before oops.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • She had no curriculum.
  • She prioritizes Mesa College classes over Grossmont!
  • & doesn't answer questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of disorganization, weak teaching, and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 512

Course coverage

CSIS1105 reviews
CSIS1603 reviews
CSIS1653 reviews
CSIS2973 reviews
CISC1921 review
Show 2 more courses
CSCI1101 review
CSIS2961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1