AI Rate Professor

Health Education

Jason Stevens

HED155 · NUTR255 · HED115 · HED255 · HED159 · NUTR155 · NUTR159 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
93.1%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want an engaging health or nutrition class where steady work usually pays off well.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesCaringHighly recommendedOrganized courseExtra credit
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Stevens as engaging, caring, and organized.
  • Most students earn high grades, especially when they complete weekly work and attend or watch lectures.
  • Online reviews are strong, but a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Most students report A grades with , and , but the A still depends on doing weekly work and paying attention.

Online evidence is mostly easy and , while in-person evidence stresses attendance and notes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The because , though some sections cover a lot of information.

Online students emphasize manageable modules, while and engaging lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance is not always described as strictly required, but success.

Online reviews rely on weekly modules, while and understanding.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes useful material enjoyable.

Both formats are highly recommended, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Grades are mostly A-range, and students , and chances to make up work despite one tough-grading online review.

Format shift

, while online reviews include one strict-project outlier.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most students describe weekly work as manageable, though some mention lots of .

Format shift

Online workload ranges from very light modules to heavy midterms, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students repeatedly call , and motivational across many years.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, with in-person comments being especially passionate.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and finals rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, projects, midterms, and finals, while , and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently praise his lectures, kindness, and ability to make nutrition and health content useful and interesting.

Main concern

Attendance and note-taking matter for doing well.

What students said

“This class was so good it makes me want to double major or minor in nutrition”
NUTR155
“Show up to class and be engaged and it won't be hard.”
HED255
“Stevens is such a great professor!”
HED155

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually describe the course as , and lecture-video based, though one review reports hard midterms and many assignments.

Main concern

Some online .

What students said

“Class is very easy.”
NUTR155
“So many assignment and .”
NUTR155
“ !”
NUTR155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because and many students describe tests as fair or manageable.

Open Book FinalWeekly QuizzesStudy GuidesIn-Class QuizStandard Midterms

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policies.

In-Class QuizFair TestsPop Quizzes
“weekly in-class quiz”
HED155
“He is very fair and grading”
HED155
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
HED155

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention quizzes, midterms, a vitamins and , and one open-book final, but .

Open Book FinalWeekly QuizzesMidtermsStudy Guides
“The and open book”
NUTR155
“There are discussions, quizzes, and a quiz as you watch the lecture.”
NUTR155
“COMPLETE THE STUDY GUIDES as it helps for things such as the and , and the final.”
NUTR155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Stevens made this !”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“His lectures are very thourough and easily entertaining/engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ ”

⚖️

84/100

“He is very fair and grading and he gives many opportunities.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • He really knows how to teach and get his students to learn the material.
  • excited to learn

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up, !
  • Class is very easy.
  • Some of the material can be hard but he takes it step by step

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about his students, is so kind, and is so fun to listen to.
  • and genuinely cares about his students.
  • super caring for his students and understanding

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is highly credible because it uses 29 detailed reviews across online and in-person formats from 2017 to 2023 with very consistent praise.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR15511 reviews
HED15510 reviews
NUTR1593 reviews
HED2552 reviews
HED1151 review
Show 2 more courses
HED1591 review
NUTR2551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 5 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1