AI Rate Professor

Cultural Studies

Gibran Guido

CCS236 · ENGL236 · CCS100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if the topic interests you, but avoid CCS100 if you need a low-stress GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing experienceEssay based onlineTough grading riskHeavy readingCaring teacher
  • Reviews are sharply split between excellent experiences and very negative CCS100 in-person experiences.
  • , and more supportive than the difficult in-person CCS100 reviews.
  • The , and limited grading flexibility in some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Online reviews suggest an A is manageable, but CCS100 , and exams where few students earned As.

and feedback, while in-person CCS100 evidence shows a and exam risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Some courses feel engaging and manageable, but CCS100 can be reading-heavy with and .

Online courses sound easier and essay-based, while in-person CCS100 sounds unusually challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews mention participation matters but do not clearly prove a .

Both formats mention participation, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and course format, but CCS100 reviews warn strongly against the workload and grading.

Online reviews are positive, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Two CCS100 reviews report tough grading, no curve, and very low .

Format shift

Strict grading concerns come from in-person CCS100, while and late-work leniency.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Online workload sounds light, but CCS100 and far more work than expected.

Format shift

Online , while in-person CCS100 reviews describe heavy reading and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Some students call him caring and fun, but CCS100 reviewers describe poor lecturing and unhelpful answers.

Format shift

Online teaching comments are positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

In-person CCS100 emphasizes quizzes and exams, while .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on essays and feedback, while in-person CCS100 and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

comments and two severe CCS100 complaints about workload, grading, and exams.

Main concern

CCS100 may be much harder and .

What students said

“took 3 times more time than any other upper level class.”
CCS100
“Hardest course I've ever taken (SDSU).”
CCS100
“Great lectures, Fun professor, I learned so much from this class!”
ENGL236

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and a kind professor.

Main concern

Participation and .

What students said

“There is literally only 5/6 assignments and .”
CCS236
“Not a lot of homework and .”
ENGL236

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because online evidence is essay-based, while in-person CCS100 reviews describe open-note but obscure exams and .

Weekly Reading QuizzesOpen Note ExamsObscure Exam QuestionsNo CurveEssay Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CCS100 and open-note exams with obscure questions and .

Weekly Reading QuizzesOpen Note ExamsObscure QuestionsNo Curve
“ ”
CCS100
“ , but questions are very obscure.”
CCS100
“ though 3/4 of the class failed it.”
CCS100

Online

Online reviews describe essay assignments and feedback, but do not clearly prove .

Essay AssignmentsFeedback on Late Work
“There is literally only 5/6 assignments and .”
CCS236
“ .”
ENGL236

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hardest course I've ever taken (SDSU).”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course-format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Great lectures, Fun professor, I learned so much from this class!”

⚠️ Course Risk

35/100

“SAVE YOURSELF.”

📝 Workload Split

34/100

“took 3 times more time than any other upper level class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was very involved, easy to talk to
  • Great lectures, Fun professor, I learned so much from this class!
  • Very bad lecturer too.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Not a lot of homework and .
  • There is literally only 5/6 assignments and .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Tough grader out of 75 person class only 2 got an A
  • , but questions are very obscure.
  • though 3/4 of the class failed it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only 6 reviews, but the comments are detailed and show a and course split.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CCS1003 reviews
ENGL2362 reviews
CCS2361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values