AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Youssef Sarmad

MATH285 · MATH280 · MATH160 · MATH176 · MATH178 · MATH281 · MATH6826 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH175 · MATH119 · STAT160 · MATH119X · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if you will attend, ask questions, and use study guides, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingClear when structuredTough grader complaintsTest heavyExtra credit and drops
  • Students are sharply split between calling him a and .
  • Many successful students report A , and dropped scores.
  • The main risk is inconsistent teaching clarity in higher math courses and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with , and dropped scores, but the course is not effortless for everyone.

Online evidence is split, while steady work and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Students often say he makes math clearer, but many others describe and stressful higher-level courses.

Online reviews are too limited and mixed, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is strongly encouraged because several students say skipping class hurts, but .

Online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

61/100

, but the number of intense negative reviews makes him a risky choice.

Online recommendation is mixed from only two reviews, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He offers , drops scores, extensions, and retakes, but several students complain that .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and strict final cutoffs.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and tests require steady work, though some students say the load is manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework in one course, while stressful workloads.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Many students praise his patience and care, but repeated complaints about confusing, disorganized teaching lower the score.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed and thin, while and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and study guides, with several courses described as test heavy.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and homework, but and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show strong upside for students who attend and ask questions, but also many severe complaints about confusion and .

Main concern

The main concern is and .

What students said

“He really cares that the students understand the material.”
MATH119X
“ .”
MATH280
“ .”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is mixed, with one student calling him helpful and another saying the and unhelpful.

Main concern

Online students may need .

What students said

“As long as you do the work, it's easy to get an A.”
MATH180
“His class and dont even get me started with his study guide its a complete joke.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually standard math tests supported by study guides or , but some students say .

Study GuidesTest HeavyHomework-Based TestsDropped Lowest TestNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading, study guides, similar homework-style questions, dropped tests, and .

Test HeavyStudy GuidesHomework-Based TestsDropped Lowest Test
“ , and .”
MATH160
“ he shows in class.”
MATH281
“You study the homework but the ?”
MATH178

Online

Online reviews mention exams and homework, but they do not clearly prove .

ExamsHomeworkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“His class ”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He really cares that the students understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“He really cares that the students understand the material.”

⚖️

58/100

“ .”

📈 Easy A Potential

68/100

“Easy A, !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • I literally did not understand anything from his teachings.
  • He makes the class much easier than it is.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you do the work, it's easy to get an A.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and , and answers all of your questions.
  • He let me redo an .
  • He will help you if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 41 reviews span many years and courses, with detailed but polarized evidence.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH16012 reviews
MATH1786 reviews
MATH1806 reviews
MATH2803 reviews
STAT1603 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1102 reviews
MATH1192 reviews
MATH2852 reviews
MATH119X1 review
MATH1751 review
MATH1761 review
MATH2811 review
MATH68261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 3 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2