AI Rate Professor

Music

Audra Puccio-Nagby

MUSIC118 · MUS170 · MUS118 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want supportive music instruction and are ready to practice consistently, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive music coachPractice-heavyGreat feedbackFast lecturerBeginner-sensitive
  • Most positive , and clear improvement in music skills.
  • MUS118 can feel demanding for beginners because it , and attendance.
  • Online MUS118 reviews are much weaker than in-person and MUS170 and fast pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many students earn A grades, but , and performances rather than minimal effort.

The strongest Easy A , while online MUS118 comments describe hard assignments.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The , but beginners often find the pacing, instruments, and performance work challenging.

In-person reviews show growth through practice, while online MUS118 reviews make the same material sound harder because .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and skipping class hurts the chance of passing.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

and skill growth, but several MUS118 students warn about poor communication and difficulty.

, while online reviews are mixed and depend heavily on the course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are often high and appears, but some students describe tough grading and .

Format shift

, while online MUS118 reviews report poor grades and harder completion.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students repeatedly mention , and time-consuming work.

Format shift

The heavy workload evidence is strongest in in-person MUS118, while but less detail.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most , and skill-building, but a minority describe fast lectures and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally praised, while online MUS118 teaching has clearer negative reports.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears centered , and practical skill tests more than traditional exams.

Format shift

, and practical tests, while online assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, especially for voice and music skill growth, but MUS118 , and performances.

Main concern

The main concern is a heavy practice load for students with no music background.

What students said

“Be prepared to spend a lot of time on this class.”
MUS118
“she makes us feel safe to sing and we all got so much better by the end of the semester!”
MUS170

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with two MUS118 students reporting poor explanations and while one MUS170 student strongly praised the feedback and support.

Main concern

Online MUS118 students and fast pacing independently.

What students said

“She talks too fast and .”
MUS118
“ and knows how to sing.”
MUS170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention practical and paper exams, written quizzes, rhythm tests, and performance assessments, but .

Practical ExamsPaper ExamsWritten QuizzesRhythm TestsPerformance Assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention practical and , and performance-based assessments.

Practical ExamsPaper ExamsWritten QuizzesRhythm TestsPerformance Assessments
“There are practical and paper exams”
MUS118
“ ; she tells you what to study ahead of time.”
MUS170

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to spend a lot of time on this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Audra is an amazing professor.”

📈 Effort For Grade

64/100

“I can into her class with absolutely no musical background and I stood on top of my work and was able to manage an A all semester but it was tough.”

⚠️ Workload

38/100

“You do have things due almost every class, but !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knows how to sing.
  • She does talk fast, though, but she answers questions.
  • Shes not good at teaching music.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • All You you have to do is come and .
  • Be prepared to spend a lot of time on this class.
  • The .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • she makes us feel safe to sing and we all got so much better by the end of the semester!
  • She is very cooperative with students and respects everyone.
  • Audra is more than happy to help you out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years give consistent evidence about supportive teaching, practice demands, and mixed MUS118 experiences.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MUS11811 reviews
MUS1705 reviews
MUSIC1183 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2