AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shirley Pereira

MATH128 · MATH88 · CALC3 · MATH280 · MATH160 · MATH178 · MATH281 · MATH90 · MATHACADEMY · MATH120 · MATH090 · MATH110 · MATH175 · MATH125 · MATH298 · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if , and tolerate inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityUnorganizedTough GradingHomework HeavyHelpful When Clear
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her helpful and .
  • Math success , and self-teaching.
  • Online reviews are especially risky, with complaints about communication, organization, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but many comments describe tough , and self-teaching.

Online evidence is contradictory with one easy-A review and several harsh reviews, while and student self-study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Math content is often challenging, and harder than necessary.

, while in-person students especially struggle in higher-level math courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

, but missing class can severely hurt understanding and grades.

In-person reviews strongly warn that missing class hurts, while online reviews and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on the course and student because reviews and serious organization problems.

Online reviews lean negative, while and course levels.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Many students report tough grading, severe grade effects from missed items, and grades easily.

Format shift

Online grading complaints are about missed assignments and withdrawals, while , and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention , and needing extra practice to keep up.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and confusing assignments, while , and outside study.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with many students praising her help and clarity while .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is weaker and more negative, while but strongly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews often , and grade weights driven by few items.

Format shift

Both formats include test-heavy evidence, with , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and caring to extremely disorganized and confusing, especially in higher-level math.

Main concern

You may need outside study because .

What students said

“consider it a self-study class because this teacher is useless.”
MATH281
“ and interesting.”
MATH90
“Shes a as the weekly quizzes and exams.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing , and stressful grading weights, with one strong easy-A review.

Main concern

Online students report disorganization, harsh grade effects, and weak communication.

What students said

“Hard to communicate with, the ”
MATH178
“the ”
MATH120
“it's an easy A for sure!”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, weekly quizzes, and a cumulative final, with no clear proof of open-book or lenient proctoring.

Timed ExamTest HeavyCumulative FinalWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, and a cumulative final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesExamsCumulative Final
“Shes a as the weekly quizzes and exams.”
MATH125
“She only has 3 tests and .”
MATH160
“ , and .”
MATH160

Online

Online reviews mention timed exams and stressful grading weights, but do not clearly .

Timed ExamHigh-Impact Grading
“the .”
MATH125
“going from an A student to a D based on a .”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you absolutely have to take her, consider it a self-study class because this teacher is useless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ and interesting.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“Most of the classes seemed like a waste of time due to the lack of organization.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

38/100

“Shes a as the weekly quizzes and exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She taught material in a way that was easy to understand.
  • She doesn't do any examples and on the occasion which she does, hardly ever gets the answers right.
  • and !!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • .
  • .
  • I missed one day and that one day hurt my grade a lot.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Hard to communicate with, the
  • .
  • She

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and formats, with detailed recurring , and organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 518
3 out of 511
2 out of 512
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH2808 reviews
MATH2817 reviews
MATH906 reviews
MATH1755 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH1254 reviews
MATH1283 reviews
MATH0902 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH1782 reviews
MATH882 reviews
1601 review
CALC31 review
MATH1601 review
MATH2981 review
MATHACADEMY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2