AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Andrew Xiao

CHEM120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if and but uneven professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but unorganizedTough graderExam-heavy challengeCaring with extensionsNeeds self-study
  • Students agree he is kind, humorous, and wants students to pass.
  • Lectures do not fully prepare students for tests, so independent study is important.
  • , and the workload can be demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and a need to study beyond lectures.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Chemistry content feels challenging because lectures do not cover enough of .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , but he shows some flexibility by extending deadlines and allowing late labs.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Students appreciate his kindness but hesitate because , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Multiple reviews call him a and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students mention homework, labs, and heavy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is personable and caring, but disorganization and insufficient lecture coverage limit the learning experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention labs, homework, and tests, with exams and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a and whose grading is tough.

Main concern

Tests and for.

What students said

“The lectures are nowhere near enough to cover the ”
CHEM120
“He's a humorous person but a .”
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say , though specific proctoring policies are not proven.

Hard TestsLecture-Test MismatchStrict Lab Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and not fully covered in lecture, but they do not clearly prove closed-book format or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsLecture-Test Mismatch
“ ”
CHEM120
“His lectures are not enough to cover what's on the exam”
CHEM120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's not the best, but he's not the worst. He wants you to pass, so ask him questions”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and flexibility; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Andrew is a really nice and respectable person, he has a great sense of humor and is relatable.”

⚠️

28/100

“The lectures are nowhere near enough to cover the ”

⚖️

24/100

“He's a humorous person but a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Andrew is a really nice and respectable person, he has a great sense of humor and is relatable.
  • he's such a nice professor and it's so refreshing to see a nice chemistry professor

Theme 2

📚

  • He doesn't cover nearly enough in lectures which makes the class more difficult.
  • His lectures are not enough to cover what's on the exam so you'll have to do the .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • he is also a and .
  • he would extend the dates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from the same course provide consistent but limited evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1203 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1