AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Saenal Kim

MATH160 · MATH90 · MATH120 · STAT160 · MATH110 · MAT110 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough gradingFast paceSelf-teaching requiredMandatory participation
  • Most students describe the class as test-heavy, strict, and hard to recover in.
  • Many say lectures rely on MyMathLab or .
  • A few students note study guides, , or , but the overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but comments point to , and self-teaching.

Online and in-person reviews both describe high effort, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students , and confusing instruction even when the material itself can be straightforward.

The single online review criticizes instruction, while and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and solving problems in front of the class.

Both formats mention attendance pressure, with the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because the class is test-heavy, harshly graded, and often requires self-teaching.

Both formats are negative, though the online evidence is limited to one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and recover.

Format shift

Both online and evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of , and heavy studying for difficult tests.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most workload evidence, while the online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students say she teaches too fast, reads from materials, and leaves them to learn from MyMathLab or tutors.

Format shift

Both formats criticize the teaching approach, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as relying heavily on a and participation secondary.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly , and a need for self-teaching.

Main concern

and are often described as .

What students said

“She went through material too quickly and .”
MATH120
“She has only 3 tests and no quizz so it is very hard to get your grades higher.”
MATH110
“Most people dropped, or did not pass.”
STAT160

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and instruction relied on PowerPoint and MyMathLab.

Main concern

student.

What students said

“ but would read off the PowerPoint on my math lab.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The overall exam risk is high because comments , and difficult problems, though proctoring policies are not clearly proven.

Test HeavyStrict GradingFew TestsNotecard Allowed In STAT160

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one notecard allowance, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyStrict GradingFew TestsNotecard Allowed
“She has only 3 tests and no quizz so it is very hard to get your grades higher.”
MATH110
“She lets you bring a notecard for each test (and 4 during the final), so that helped a lot.”
STAT160
“ but the problems are the harder ones in the chapter, so study!”
MATH90

Online

The online review says the course is test heavy but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test Heavy
“There are 2 opportunities to earn . I barely passed”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to teach yourself the material from book and online.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She went through material too quickly and .”

⚖️

18/100

“She grades very harshly.”

🧪

28/100

“ and make you feel really dumb.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes off of the mymathlab instead of actually teaching.
  • She went through material too quickly and .
  • All of the " and that's where I learned most of the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She grades very harshly.
  • and she is a .
  • Most people dropped, or did not pass.

Theme 3

📝 And Participation

  • but would read off the PowerPoint on my math lab.
  • Solving problems on the chalkboard in front of the class is a must.
  • She teaches fast and gives you very little time to complete problems on your own.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 10 reviews span several years and are consistent, but the sample is modest and online evidence has only one review.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1204 reviews
STAT1602 reviews
MAT1101 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1601 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1