AI Rate Professor

Biology

Carolee Caffrey

BIO120 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself and only need to soften the grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedConfusing TestsExtra CreditAccessible Office Hours
  • Students describe weak teaching preparation and poor subject command.
  • because of a strong focus on cheating prevention.
  • and office hours helped, but did not offset the teaching problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

exists, but and weak instruction make an A depend on self-teaching rather than easy grading.

Online evidence mentions but , while the in-person review gives an A- without showing easy grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content became hard because and .

Both formats point to difficulty caused by instruction rather than naturally hard biology content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students describe , and unprofessional conduct.

Both formats are negative, with and in person focused on teaching ability.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

suggests some grading support, but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

Only the online review mentions , while the .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The online course had many lectures and labs explained rather than demonstrated, but workload volume is not clearly overwhelming.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions many lectures, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students describe poor , and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, with the online review emphasizing preparation and the in-person review emphasizing knowledge and conduct.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The clearest assessment evidence is test-heavy with .

Format shift

Online evidence supports a , while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and questions both teaching ability and professionalism.

Main concern

The student says she could not teach the biology content well.

What students said

“She didn't last long in this college, maybe because she can not teach.”
BIO120
“Inadequate knowledge and strange behavior towards student, her conduct was not professional at all.”
BIO120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes an unprepared course with , and office hours.

Main concern

because the instructor was focused on cheating prevention.

What students said

“She got our class on short notice, so she wasn't very prepared for it she was only a week ahead of us in the material.”
BIO120
“She was very hyper-focused on us not cheating, so .”
BIO120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because of cheating concerns, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test HeavyCheating-Focused QuestionsUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , finals, or proctoring rules.

Online

The because of cheating concerns, but it does not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyCheating-Focused Questions
“She was very hyper-focused on us not cheating, so .”
BIO120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was very hyper-focused on us not cheating, so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and testing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“She didn't last long in this college, maybe because she can not teach.”

⚠️

25/100

“She was very hyper-focused on us not cheating, so .”

👍 Student Support

45/100

“Lots of office hours & .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • She didn't last long in this college, maybe because she can not teach.
  • She got our class on short notice, so she wasn't very prepared for it she was only a week ahead of us in the material.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • She was very hyper-focused on us not cheating, so .
  • A lot of lectures both on zoom and recorded.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values