AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Carissa Cardenas

COUN120 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

She looks like an excellent choice for students who want a caring, supportive, and low-stress counseling professor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring ProfessorBeginner FriendlyHelpful AdvisingStudent SupportEasy Course
  • Both reviews are highly positive, with students emphasizing kindness, care, and support.
  • The online review gives strong evidence of helpful guidance for first-year students and education planning.
  • The small review count limits certainty, but the tone is exceptionally strong.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The low difficulty ratings and one reported A suggest an , but comments do not prove a free A.

Both formats are positive, but only the and neither format gives detailed grading evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe the course experience as supportive and .

Online evidence highlights helpful material, while but too brief.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

The reviews .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and the detailed review is strongly enthusiastic about her care and support.

Online evidence provides the strongest recommendation, while but positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Low difficulty and an A grade suggest lenient grading, but .

Format shift

The in-person review has the only reported A, while online .

Workload

Light

82/100

Very low difficulty ratings imply a light workload, but the .

Format shift

, so the workload judgment relies on difficulty ratings and tone.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe her as exceptionally caring, helpful, and supportive, especially for first-year guidance.

Format shift

Online evidence gives detailed praise for teaching support, while but positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not mention assignments, quizzes, exams, or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The but too brief to support detailed conclusions.

Main concern

The review is too .

What students said

“Muy buena maestra”
COUN120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is extremely positive and , and useful material.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one detailed online review.

What students said

“she is one of the nicest and .”
COUN120
“her material helps a lot within higher education.”
COUN120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book, take-home, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is one of the nicest and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in care, advising, and course support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Professor Cardenas was the first professor I spoke to at Grossmont and she is one of the nicest and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“She made my experience at Grossmont a 10/10”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“she deeply cares about her students and helped me out with my Ed Plan since I was a first year student.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • she is one of the nicest and .
  • Muy buena maestra

Theme 2

🧭 About Student Support

  • she deeply cares about her students and helped me out with my Ed Plan since I was a first year student.
  • her material helps a lot within higher education.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews are available, so the tone is very positive but the evidence base is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values