AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nirmala Kashyap

MATH160 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can learn math independently and manage a heavy workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredHeavy homeworkConfusing lecturesPoor supportTest heavy
  • Students repeatedly say they had to teach themselves the material.
  • Homework and .
  • Both online and in-person reviews strongly discourage taking the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and weak instructional support even when homework offers unlimited attempts.

, while the only in-person review reports failing the class.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels challenging because and students say they must learn the material alone.

Both online and in-person reviews describe confusion, but online reviews give and homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One online , but multiple tags warn that skipping class can hurt performance.

Online evidence mentions optional classes, while the and skip-class warnings.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because , and overloaded.

All formats are negative, with online reviews giving repeated self-teaching complaints and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

because students report failed tests, few graded items, and delayed grade visibility.

Format shift

Online reviews mention unlimited homework attempts but and ; the in-person review reports an F.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The workload is heavy, with repeated mentions of lots of , and too much work.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework, with online reviews adding weekly quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching quality is very poor because students say , and self-teaching is required.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly criticize lecture clarity, while the own material.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, with homework carrying major weight in at least one online class.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, weekly quizzes, and tests; the but gives fewer assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the professor was not helpful or caring.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH160
“ as well.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe , lots of , and delayed grading.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves and may not know their real grade until late.

What students said

“I had to completely for the entire semester.”
MATH160
“Get ready to teach yourself.”
MATH160
“She has a ”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules, but tests and as difficult and poorly aligned with instruction.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesTests Cover Unlearned Material

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and tests on material students say they never learned, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesTest HeavyTests Cover Unlearned Material
“the ”
MATH160
“She has a ”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had to completely for the entire semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The lectures never made any sense”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“ as well.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I had to completely for the entire semester.
  • The lectures never made any sense
  • She does not teach her own material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I've .
  • Thank god the hw is 35% of your grade with unlimited attempts or I wouldn't have passed.
  • She has a

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • Shes sweet just not my type of teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews are consistent and detailed, but the sample is small and focused on one course.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1604 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values