AI Rate Professor

Cultural Studies

Eduardo Ochoa

CCS115 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless and navigate a highly opinion-driven classroom.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingPolitical content concernsHarsh viewpoint climateNot recommendedHigh difficulty
  • Both reviews are strongly negative about teaching quality and course alignment.
  • Students say the class centered on political opinions instead of the course description.
  • Both recorded grades are A, but comments describe high risk if students disagree with him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Although both reported grades are A, comments suggest the grade may depend on agreeing with the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels difficult because students say instruction is poor and not aligned with the course description, not because the content is inherently advanced.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because they describe the class as propaganda-driven and lacking real teaching.

The recommendation evidence and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Both students received A grades, but comments allege grade risk for disagreement, so as reliably lenient.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The reviews do not describe workload in detail, so the main and classroom climate.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with no online workload information.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Both reviews say he did not teach effectively and replaced course instruction with political content.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and both criticize teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching, political bias, and fear of grade penalties for disagreement.

Main concern

Students report that course content and professor's views.

What students said

“He did not teach according to the course description at all!”
CCS115
“If you have different opinions from his, he will give you a bad grade!”
CCS115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He did not teach according to the course description at all!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He did not teach according to the course description at all!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“This is the !”

⚖️

30/100

“If you have different opinions from his, he will give you a bad grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All he did was spreading propaganda and you have to agree with his political opinions!
  • He did not teach at all!

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades & Fairness

  • If you have different opinions from his, he will give you a bad grade!
  • The college needs to really do better at quality control of professors.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews, though both are detailed and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CCS1152 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values