AI Rate Professor

Business Technology

Evan Hanna

BUS109 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and tolerate vague guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor feedbackTough graderVague instructionsTextbook-dependentHeavy workload
  • Students describe weak teaching support, vague instructions, and .
  • Grades reported are low, and and heavy workload.
  • The online course appears risky for students who need guidance or flexibility around tech issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because reported grades are C+ and F with and .

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels difficult because students must rely on textbook material while handling vague instructions and programming issues.

Only online reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is tagged, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

Attendance evidence is limited to online tags and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend him because they report poor , and bad outcomes.

Recommendation evidence comes only from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and the reported grades are C+ and F.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

One review tags lots of homework, and both reviews describe a demanding course with weak support.

Format shift

Workload evidence comes only from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe him as , and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and test-heavy tags.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, citing poor feedback, vague instructions, tech-issue dismissal, and heavy work.

Main concern

Students may have to self-teach while and .

What students said

“ .”
BUS109
“He .”
BUS109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and test-heavy assessment, but they do not clearly prove .

Test HeavyPoor Exam Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention exams and test-heavy work, but they do not clearly prove .

Test HeavyPoor Exam Feedback
“He .”
BUS109

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He depends on the textbook material to expect you to learn instead of doing it himself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He depends on the textbook material to expect you to learn instead of doing it himself.”

⚖️

10/100

“He .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • Very dismissive about tech issues that occur in the programming
  • He depends on the textbook material to expect you to learn instead of doing it himself.
  • but instructions were vague.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • He .
  • but instructions were vague.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are negative, detailed, and consistent about poor support and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values