AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Cardenas

ENGLISH120 · ENGLISHCOMP11O · ENG110 · ENG122 · ENG126 · ENG120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if and can handle writing-heavy work, but if you need a low-stress class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring feedbackExtra creditPaper-heavy workloadMixed grading fairnessParticipation matters
  • Students , and .
  • The workload is highly inconsistent, with and assignments.
  • Getting an A is realistic, but the effort and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students earned A grades and mention or effort-based grading, but several reviews say the workload can be heavy and .

The online evidence supports a good grade with genuine effort, while and harsh.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The course content itself seems manageable, but , and pacing can make some sections feel much harder than a typical English class.

The online review sounds reasonable, while and semester.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several in-person reviews say participation or , and missing class could affect success.

Attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and , but negative reviews warn about workload, communication, and grading issues.

The single online review is strongly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

A grades are common and appears often, but a few reviews describe tough or .

Format shift

Online grading is described as reasonable, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some students call the class not stressful, but multiple , and packed deadlines.

Format shift

The online review only says homework requires genuine effort, while .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and support, while negative reviews describe boring lectures, poor responsiveness, or less productive class time.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but limited, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and projects, with only a few mentions of exams.

Format shift

Online assessment evidence mentions homework, while in-person , and some exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, ranging from easy-A praise with to complaints about excessive papers, poor productivity, and .

Main concern

Workload and sections.

What students said

“She had us write 10-16 pg papers almost every week.”
ENG120
“This class is such an easy A as long as you do the work.”
ENG110
“Not a stressful class. No tests. Not a lot of .”
ENG126

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is very positive and describes a effort.

Main concern

The single online review gives limited evidence about workload and .

What students said

“She's exactly the , knowledgeable.”
ENG126
“ and you'll learn plenty and get a good grade.”
ENG126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and inconsistent, with one review saying no tests and .

Some Sections Have No TestsTwo Exams MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments conflict because one section had no tests while .

No Tests In One SectionTwo Exams MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“No tests.”
ENG126
“There are four papers and two exams.”
ENGLISH120

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam format, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is such an easy A as long as you do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She's exactly the , knowledgeable.”

📈 Grade Value

76/100

“This class is such an easy A as long as you do the work.”

⚠️ Workload Risk

45/100

“Way way way too much work and projects.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Julie is a kind professor and wants you to succeed.
  • and suggests edits.
  • The most boring lectures, accused me of cheating and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She had us write 10-16 pg papers almost every week.
  • The last 8 weeks are really packed with assignments.
  • Not a stressful class. No tests. Not a lot of .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • She is not a and she gives a ton of opportunities.
  • There is available.
  • I received a grade much lower than I deserved.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple years provide enough detail, though opinions are polarized and only one review is online.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1263 reviews
ENG1222 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENG1201 review
ENGLISH1201 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISHCOMP11O1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values