AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kirsten Lollis

MATH176 · MATH15B · MATH116 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you will keep up with math practice and , but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsTest-heavy mathResponsive onlineParticipation mattersMixed online exams
  • Most students say and .
  • The class , and participation.
  • Online experience is mixed because one review praises the format while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students can do fine with steady work and studying, but the course is test-heavy and not an easy A for low effort.

Online evidence is mixed due to rigid testing in one section, while and study are enough.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math material can be challenging, but and study guides make it more manageable.

Online ALEKS is described as fairly simple, while in-person MATH176 is clearly challenging but well taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and one online review describes a , but there is no broad proof of .

Online flexibility is reduced by scheduled Zoom tests, while and keeping up.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair if students do the work.

In-person reviews are consistently positive, while online reviews and strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews describe fair support and study guides, but and .

Format shift

, while but effort-dependent.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Students report a lot of homework and but still requires steady effort.

Format shift

Online workload includes ALEKS and tests, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most , and useful guidance.

Format shift

Online support is praised in one review but criticized in another, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments repeatedly mention tests, study guides, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention Zoom tests and ALEKS, while , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive and , and a need to do the work.

Main concern

The course , and participation demands.

What students said

“The class can be challenging but .”
MATH176
“Like any other math class, this class had a lot of homework and but Professor Lollis makes it easy to follow.”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a simple ALEKS-based format with strong support and a rigid Zoom test setup that felt student-unfriendly.

Main concern

and anti-cheating focus may be stressful in some sections.

What students said

“This was a fairly simple online format using ALEKS online program.”
MATH15B
“She has you log into a and only gives one time.”
MATH116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style appears test-heavy, with one and in-person sections using study guides.

Zoom Test MeetingOne Scheduled Test TimeStudy GuidesExam Policy Partly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsStudy GuidesFinal Without Study Guide
“She gave us study guides for .”
MATH176
“This class had a lot of homework and .”
MATH176

Online

Online evidence proves Zoom test meetings at a single scheduled time in one section, but does not clearly .

Zoom Test MeetingOne Scheduled Test TimeProctoring Details Not Clearly Proven
“She has you log into a and only gives one time.”
MATH116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class can be challenging but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, testing, and online format. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“The class can be challenging but .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ if .”

🧪

48/100

“She has you log into a and only gives one time.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is easily accessible and .
  • Professor if I had any questions.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Tests

  • This class had a lot of homework and .
  • If you dont do work or study you wont do well in the class.
  • She gave us study guides for .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • This was a fairly simple online format using ALEKS online program.
  • She has you log into a and only gives one time.
  • Seems like she cares more about preventing cheating than students grasping the concepts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but they contain useful format-specific detail and mostly consistent teaching comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1762 reviews
MATH1161 review
MATH15B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1