AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brianna Reynolds

MATH112 · MATH96 · ENG110 · MATH097 · MATH90 · MAT101 · MATH090 · MATH110 · MATH125 · MATH100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Brianna Reynolds if and a generally relaxed class, but watch deadlines and grade standing closely.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient and helpfulLaid backMixed clarityFlexible projectsSome grading risk
  • Most positive reviews describe her as patient, helpful, and laid back.
  • Older negative reviews criticize unclear instruction, poor teaching, and strict outcomes for borderline grades.
  • The workload seems manageable overall, but the and test timing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students call her easy and mention partial credit, though borderline-grade warnings prevent a higher score.

, while the online review shows a B+ and confusing assessment timing.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Many students describe the class as easy and supportive, but students.

In-person comments lean easier, while the online review is moderate because the issue was organization rather than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and participation matters, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

The online review has a participation tag, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

She is recommended for patience and help, but mixed teaching clarity and .

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, while the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Partial credit and easy-class comments suggest leniency, but one review warns that borderline students can still fail.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly prove leniency.

Workload

Light

72/100

Most reviews describe an easy or laid-back course, though one online review mentions lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person workload looks light, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often called patient, sweet, and helpful, but several .

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly positive, while the but organization was odd.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews mention weekly discussions, interview projects, homework, and tests, with more evidence for .

Format shift

The online review mentions homework and a test, while , and partial credit.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive about patience and help, with and .

Main concern

Some students found her unclear, dry, or unhelpful in earlier math classes.

What students said

“very helpful and .”
MATH110
“Doesn't teach well. .”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says she explained well but and testing deadlines oddly.

Main concern

Homework and .

What students said

“She was good at explaining but .”
MATH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a test and projects, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Test MentionedInterview ProjectsWeekly Discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and interview projects, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Weekly DiscussionsInterview Projects
“Class consisted of weekly discussions and 2 interview projects.”
MATH112

Online

The online review mentions another test being added, but does not clearly prove the .

Test Mentioned
“she forgot so we had to do the ”
MATH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“really like her as a teacher! easy and gives partial credit for almost anything. very helpful and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She has a lot of patients and willing to help all the time.”

📈 Grade Outlook

78/100

“easy and gives partial credit for almost anything.”

🧭 Organization Risk

50/100

“It was just an odd experience.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !
  • Doesn't teach well. .
  • and fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Laid back and easy.
  • easy and gives partial credit for almost anything.
  • at the end of the semester she will still fail you.

Theme 3

📚 About Work and Structure

  • Class consisted of weekly discussions and 2 interview projects.
  • She was good at explaining but .
  • At times she seems to be as lost as some of the students are.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews across a long time span, but many are old and some are brief.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
ENG1101 review
MAT1011 review
MATH0901 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH0971 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1121 review
MATH901 review
MATH961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values