AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Emami

RTVC100 · GENED120 · G · MATH88 · MATH160 · MATH65 · ALG110 · MATH103 · MATH088 · MATH90 · MATH120 · MATH090 · MTH103 · COM124 · MATH110 · MATH175 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle a strict, sarcastic classroom and learn math mostly from notes, tutoring, and self-study.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict attendanceUnapproachable toneExtra creditNo textbook or homeworkHard to understand
  • Students often describe him as knowledgeable but hard to understand and intimidating.
  • Grades can be manageable through attendance, classwork, notes, and .
  • Many negative reviews focus on yelling, sarcasm, impatience, and discouraging questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is realistic for students who attend, keep up with classwork, and use , but unclear teaching and test-heavy grading raise the real effort.

Online evidence suggests easier grades through Zoom attendance, while in-person grades depend more on attendance, classwork, and surviving tough tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is often basic, but , and test questions beyond class examples make it feel harder.

Both formats mention confusion, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as required, with late arrivals or absences causing major problems.

Online reviews mention Zoom attendance and cameras, while and punctuality matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Many students advise against him because his classroom tone, accent, and explanations make learning stressful.

Online reviews are mixed but limited, while the larger in-person record trends strongly polarized and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Grading can be forgiving through , , and low homework demands, but tests can still surprise students.

Format shift

Online grading sounds especially easy in one review, while and participation.

Workload

Light

78/100

Many reviews and classwork.

Format shift

Both formats suggest low workload, with in-person reviews providing most of the evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear explanations, a hard-to-understand accent, impatience, yelling, and discomfort asking questions.

Format shift

Online reviews mention the same communication issues, but in-person reviews provide the stronger pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are often , and notebooks rather than homework.

Format shift

In-person reviews clearly show test-heavy grading, while online evidence is too thin beyond attendance-based grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show an easy or grade-friendly structure for attentive students, but many report yelling, sarcasm, weak explanations, and .

Main concern

Students who need patient explanations or open Q&A may struggle with his tone and pace.

What students said

“The homework was really easy but weirdly, on the taught you how to do them!!!”
MATH120
“ , and participation are counted as grade.”
MATH110
“he seems to make fun of the people that dont understand, makes it scary to ask questions”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are split between easy grading through Zoom attendance and frustration with , and .

Main concern

Online and unclear teaching.

What students said

“His policy for online classes was show up to the zoom meeting and almost instantly you get an A or B.”
MATH120
“Also cameras have to be on during attendance and because his accent makes it hard to understand”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies, with some student-friendly details like multiple choice or notes allowed but also complaints about difficult or .

Tests and quizzesMultiple choice testsNotes sometimes allowedCamera attendance for online classNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, sometimes multiple choice or notes allowed, but do not clearly prove a consistent closed-book policy.

Tests and quizzesMultiple choice testsNotes sometimes allowed
“all the ”
MATH103
“Goodside... .”
MATH120
“ , and participation are counted as grade.”
MATH110

Online

Online reviews mention camera use for attendance but do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or .

Camera attendanceNo clear online exam policy
“Also cameras have to be on during attendance”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The but the only way I'm surviving is going to tutoring and teaching myself. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grading, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Not good at explaining and if you don't understand something, he discourages questions by answering as if you're asking how to call 911.”

📈 Grade Path

63/100

“If you study and do the in class work you are garanteed an A.”

⏰

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a little hard to understand with his accent and I usually ask a ton of questions in math but he's very unapproachable and will yell at you and make kids feel dumb.
  • Gives short fast explanations.
  • he seems to make fun of the people that dont understand, makes it scary to ask questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lot's of and .
  • , and participation are counted as grade.
  • Pretty easy class. He does have an accent that's hard to understand but if you pay attention and show up to class you'll do fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • Do NOT play with your cell phone, talk during lectures, bother buying a textbook, or .
  • He is offensive if you dont like horrid examples and constant talking about his previous divorces.
  • Just show up pay attention and you'll be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years with consistent themes about attendance, low homework, unclear teaching, and polarizing tone.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 58
3 out of 510
2 out of 511
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH10314 reviews
MATH12013 reviews
MATH1105 reviews
MATH883 reviews
MATH0902 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH1752 reviews
1031 review
ALG1101 review
COM1241 review
G1 review
GENED1201 review
MATH0881 review
MATH1601 review
MATH651 review
MATH901 review
MTH1031 review
RTVC1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3