AI Rate Professor

Theater

Brian Rickel

THEATER101 · THTR130 · THTR101 · THTR120 · THTR131 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
94.44%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and can keep up with the reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and welcomingEngaging lecturerFunny and passionateReading requiredExtra credit available
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as caring, funny, knowledgeable, and .
  • if you read, participate, and complete the work.
  • Online evidence is limited and mixed, with one strong positive review and one negative review about tone and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable with reading, participation, notes, and , but it is not a free grade if you ignore the plays or quizzes.

but effort-based A, while online evidence is too mixed and limited to raise confidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is approachable and engaging, but plays, theory, memorization, and .

In-person reviews call the class fun and manageable, while one and watching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not always described as formally mandatory, but , and quizzes make showing up important.

In-person reviews clearly tie attendance to success, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students recommend him because , and makes theater material meaningful.

, while the two online reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear fair and often favorable when students read, participate, use , and ask for help.

Format shift

, while one online review calls him a .

Workload

Moderate

66/100

, but , and occasional papers still require consistency.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually described as manageable, while one online review reports a lot of reading and viewing.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly praise , and ability to make theater engaging.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mixed because the sample is only two reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment appears , and scene work rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment detail, while but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, , and manageable work with reading required.

Main concern

Students who skip reading or participation can struggle with quizzes and graded discussion.

What students said

“If you ever have the opportunity to work with or !”
THTR101
“ and but they also make you use your brain.”
THTR101
“If you don't read the play you WILL fail the quiz.”
THTR101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split between one enthusiastic review and , and grading.

Main concern

The small online sample is mixed and includes a and discussion judgment.

What students said

“This class was awesome! This teacher really knows the subject.”
THTR101
“The course has a lot of reading and watching of boring material.”
THTR101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest generally student-friendly assessment with , and at least one course without a .

Online quizzesNo final exam in one THTR101 reviewEasy testsOne midtermFinal paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention online , and one course with a midterm plus final paper.

Online quizzesNo final examEasy testsOne midtermFinal paper
“ and doesn't have a .”
THTR101
“ but they also make you use your brain.”
THTR101
“ .”
THTR120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you ever have the opportunity to work with or !”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Brian is an amazing teacher, very passionate about narrative theory and knows how to interpret and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ !”

⚖️ Grade Value

82/100

“ , and do , and you will get an A or B for sure!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about education and he knows his craft well.
  • He is extremely engaging.
  • He really invests in his students and wants to see them learn.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • and but they also make you use your brain.
  • If you don't read the play you WILL fail the quiz.
  • Easy A if you can read.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and makes everyone feel welcomed and accepted.
  • .
  • He cares about his students and does anything he can to help them succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 reviews span many years, most are detailed, and the online evidence.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

THTR10118 reviews
THEATER1013 reviews
THTR1202 reviews
THTR1301 review
THTR1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values