AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Ann Hubbard

ESL119 · ESL088L6221 · ESL088 · ESL106 · ESOL106 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive but serious ESL class that rewards consistent effort with real improvement.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDeeply caring mentorClear grammar and writing coachHigh improvement valueHomework with feedbackHighly recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and transformational for ESL learning.
  • The class is not a free A, but , and .
  • and patience are the main reasons students say their writing and grammar improve.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Good grades are common, but comments repeatedly say students , and .

Online evidence is positive but limited, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

and writing clearly, but the class , and serious improvement work.

Both formats praise clarity, but is meaningful rather than easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and sometimes strict, but comments also describe her as considerate and flexible with students.

In-person reviews give the strongest attendance evidence, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and helps them improve.

Both online and providing much stronger volume and detail.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades are fair and often high, but students say , and follow feedback rather than expect an automatic A.

Format shift

; online reviews do not clearly describe grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and , but students usually view it as useful rather than excessive.

Format shift

and essays, while online workload evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students consistently describe her as , and highly effective at improving English skills.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with in-person reviews offering high-confidence evidence across many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment , and class work more than exams.

Format shift

and , while online reviews provide little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews , and ability to improve students' English skills.

Main concern

She can be strict and assigns meaningful homework, especially for students who are not keeping up.

What students said

“She is very strict but helps a lot!”
ESL106
“If you pay attention and A.”
ESL106
“Don't expect this class to be easy at all”
ESL106

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are strongly , and a caring teaching style.

Main concern

One online review rates difficulty high, so students should expect serious work.

What students said

“she helps students understand everything in her class”
ESL088
“she really care about students learning, and , and .”
ESL106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and exam preparation, but they do not clearly prove the .

Exam Preparation MentionedTests Not ManyPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and not many tests, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Exam Preparation MentionedTests Not Many
“she helps you have a .”
ESL106
“She also give you all the information which .”
ESOL106
“Tests? Not many”
ESOL106

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exam format, webcam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you really !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching quality, grading fairness, workload, and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ a great professor.”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

72/100

“If you pay attention and A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a professor who truly cares about her students, not only academic knowledge but also our life.
  • Ask her anything, she will .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Not an easy class, but it is not too hard for you to achieve A or B.
  • Don't expect this class to be easy at all
  • She is not especially hard with the grades, but you have to study and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Growth

  • Thanks to her, my writing skill was improved a lot
  • she makes us feel confident.
  • You will realize the improvement at the end of the semester in your grammar.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 analyzed reviews across many years, with rich and highly consistent comments despite a few negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ESL10641 reviews
ESOL1065 reviews
1061 review
ESL0881 review
ESL088L62211 review
Show 1 more courses
ESL1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1