AI Rate Professor

Communication

Christina Harrell

COMM122 · LUV101 · INTERCOMM120 · COMM103 · COMM120 · COMM123 · HUMAN120 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
53.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

and supportive atmosphere, but if you need clear structure and strong instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFriendly environmentDisorganized lecturesEasy gradesUnclear testsParticipation heavy
  • Students often call her kind, funny, energetic, and .
  • A long-running complaint is that , and .
  • Many students still report easy grades if , and study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students say the class is easy and grades are attainable by doing the work, .

The online review does not discuss grades, while class outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course material and assignments are often described as easy, but content itself.

Online evidence is too limited, while teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and students mention having to talk or present, but .

Online and in-person reviews both emphasize participation, while and class talk.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether you value warmth and .

The lone online review recommends her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and overall course grades are often described as easy, though outlines and tests can be tougher.

Format shift

no meaningful online grading detail.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students often , and success from simply completing assignments.

Format shift

Workload , while the online review does not describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She is caring and energetic, but many reviews over many years , and .

Format shift

The online review is positive, while in-person reviews contain repeated long-term complaints about clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to combine speeches, outlines, journals, participation, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews describe the assessment mix, while online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, easy classes and repeated complaints about confusion and disorganization.

Main concern

The main risk is unclear teaching, scattered lectures, and .

What students said

“ ... and but she's easy-going and the material is easy.”
COMM120
“Only 5 speeches, and .”
COMM122

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is positive and highlights passion, respect, participation, and caring.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so format-specific reliability is low.

What students said

“she is the ! she is so passionate about her job and it shows”
COMM122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as study-guide based but sometimes unclear or unrelated, with .

Study Guide TestsUnclear Test QuestionsMidterm and Final MentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Study Guide TestsUnclear Test QuestionsMidterm and Final Mentioned
“There are no tricks on the .”
COMM122
“ HOWEVER.”
COMM120

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ... and but she's easy-going and the material is easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She is terribly disorganized, her handwriting is essentially illegible, and she is a VERY fast talker, making her lectures difficult to understand.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Super easy A if you just do the work”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“If , but don't expect to come away with much.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She created a very nonjudgmental environment which got the whole class comfortable with discussion and participation.
  • The life.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great teacher! Easy class!
  • She grades speeches very easy but .

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • and unstructured.
  • Loses track a lot. Talked about her life a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews over many years provide strong detail and a , and poor organization.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 512
2 out of 511
1 out of 58

Course coverage

COMM12222 reviews
COMM12018 reviews
COMM1032 reviews
1221 review
COMM1231 review
Show 3 more courses
HUMAN1201 review
INTERCOMM1201 review
LUV1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1