AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wei Huang

CHEM120 · CHEM102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesDisorganized scheduleSelf-teaching requiredDefensive with questionsHeavy homework
  • Both reviews describe very poor teaching despite one student calling him likable.
  • Students report , and needing outside resources to learn.
  • A grade bump may be possible, but the effort and frustration are high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A may , and a possible grade bump, but the learning burden is high.

The , while the online review gives no easy-grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels hard because and students must rely on outside resources.

Both online and disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but one review says never being absent may help the grade.

Only the ; the online review does not clarify attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend him because , and poor learning support.

Both online and evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One review suggests he may bump grades for strong effort, but there is too little evidence for true leniency.

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

as poorly timed online and frequent enough to be tagged as lots of .

Format shift

Online workload concern is scheduling, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe his lectures as , and .

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, with online focused on organization and in person focused on self-teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The and tests, but do not provide enough detail to show a .

Format shift

The online review mentions homework timing, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and likable but ineffective, with students relying on outside tools.

Main concern

Students may need outside resources because lectures do not teach enough.

What students said

“I learned more from YouTube, tutors, and Chemistry apps than I did from his lectures.”
CHEM102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and poor responsiveness to student input.

Main concern

Online organization and communication appear weak.

What students said

“ often assign homework in the middle of the week rather than the beginning.”
CHEM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and no study guides, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

No Study GuidesTests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and no study guides, but does not clearly prove book policy or .

No Study GuidesTests Mentioned
“No study guides for tests.”
CHEM102

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the reason I am switching my major.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ often assign homework in the middle of the week rather than the beginning.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

5/100

“He is the reason I am switching my major.”

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

25/100

“I learned more from YouTube, tutors, and Chemistry apps than I did from his lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • often assign homework in the middle of the week rather than the beginning.
  • He's a funny and likable guy, but a terrible teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are never absent and if you try hard, he'll probably bump your grade at the end.
  • No study guides for tests.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Experience

  • Does not listen to students' input.
  • He would get defensive when students asked questions he didn't know how to answer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only two reviews exist, though both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1021 review
CHEM1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values