AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jonathan Rich

SOC215 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are willing to keep up with notes and want fair support plus grade cushions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful TeacherExtra CreditDrops Lowest QuizNote Taking NeededSmooth Transition
  • The only review describes Jonathan Rich as a good teacher who offers help when needed.
  • and understand the material to do well.
  • and a dropped quiz make the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A-range grade seems realistic with note-taking and and a dropped quiz.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course sounds manageable but requires notes and a .

, so course-easiness evidence is limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The review .

There is no online evidence, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The reviewer recommends him as a .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and dropping the , though effort is still needed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload cannot be judged fully, but the review suggests steady note-taking and quizzes rather than overwhelming work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The reviewer says he is a good teacher who offers help and handled the course transition well.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

The review mentions quizzes and dropped quiz scoring but .

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says he taught well, helped students, and handled the Spring 2020 transition effectively.

Main concern

Confidence is low because there is only one review.

What students said

“As long as and have a good idea of what you're learning you should be fine.”
SOC215
“He gives an opportunity and .”
SOC215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not clearly proven, but .

QuizzesDropped Lowest QuizExtra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , and a dropped lowest quiz but does not clearly prove exam format or .

QuizzesDropped Lowest QuizExtra Credit
“He gives an opportunity and .”
SOC215

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall good teacher, he offers help when needed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching support and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Overall good teacher, he offers help when needed.”

📈 Grade Support

76/100

“He gives an opportunity and .”

📚 Course Effort

70/100

“As long as and have a good idea of what you're learning you should be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Overall good teacher, he offers help when needed.
  • It was his first year at grossmont during Spring 2020 and his transition from in person to online was good.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • As long as and have a good idea of what you're learning you should be fine.
  • He gives an opportunity and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is useful but very limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values