AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jedediah Baker

ANA615 · MACROECON · ECON120 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can tolerate a slow or inconsistent class and are willing to study economics independently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient but inconsistentBoring lecturesFair testsHard to reachDifficult subject
  • Students see Baker as patient and .
  • Several reviews say the and responsiveness.
  • The grade path is not effortless, and students report needing real study to earn an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students say economics is not an easy A and can require .

The online review gives no grade evidence, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Economics is repeatedly described as , though Baker can make some parts clearer for patient students.

, while the online review mainly discusses organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

One in-person student passed despite hardly attending, but the online review says participation matters, so .

Online evidence suggests participation matters, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students note some patience and fairness, but weak organization, boring delivery, and a 0% take-again rate make the recommendation low.

The online review is explicitly negative on taking him again, while but hesitant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

One review says he is very fair in , but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

; the online review does not clarify grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention reading, participation, and heavy studying, but not an .

Format shift

Online mentions reading and participation, while hard subject.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can be patient and fair, but students also describe boring lectures, weak organization, and slow communication.

Format shift

Online concerns center on organization and responsiveness, while and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions tests and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and often boring economics class with some fair teaching and grading.

Main concern

Students may need to study a lot because .

What students said

“Econ wasn't the easy A I was expecting.”
ECON120
“He is very fair in and spends time reviewing for them.”
ECON120
“If you are not into Econ. ..”
MACROECON

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says he cares and is funny but and slow to answer questions.

Main concern

Organization and timely communication are weak.

What students said

“He tends to commit to timelines he can't meet and isn't thorough in answering questions in a timely manner.”
ANA615

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and test review, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policies.

Tests MentionedTest ReviewPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review sessions, but exact exam rules are not clearly proven.

Tests MentionedTest Review
“He is very fair in and spends time reviewing for them.”
ECON120

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Econ wasn't the easy A I was expecting. I had to study a lot for this class and barely pulled off an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He teaches well but he doesn't really care much about it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“Out of the . Baker!”

📚 Course Difficulty

36/100

“If you are not into Econ. ..”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his teaching skills are a little off.. and the class is sooo sooo boring
  • He teaches well but he doesn't really care much about it.
  • and will answer questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Econ wasn't the easy A I was expecting.
  • I had to study a lot for this class and barely pulled off an A.
  • He is very fair in and spends time reviewing for them.

Theme 3

⏱️ About Organization

  • is not the .
  • He tends to commit to timelines he can't meet and isn't thorough in answering questions in a timely manner.
  • he is very hard to get ahold of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews are available, with one online review and older in-person comments that are somewhat consistent but limited in detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON1204 reviews
ANA6151 review
MACROECON1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values