AI Rate Professor

Exercise & Sport Science

Stefanie Basso

ES005 · HED158 · ES006A · ES293 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and manageable work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringInspirationalWelcoming ClassLight AssignmentsParticipation Matters
  • Every analyzed review gives a top quality rating and recommends her.
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, motivating, and respectful.
  • Work is manageable, but participation and consistency matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

Grades look attainable with consistency and participation, but reviews emphasize engagement rather than a free A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students describe the work as understandable and not hard, with a welcoming atmosphere that supports beginners.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, so that it is strictly mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students unanimously recommend her because , and motivating.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Reviews call her fair and straightforward, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students mention and work that was not hard, though participation and consistency still matter.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, inspiring, knowledgeable, helpful, and motivating.

Format shift

and they are consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention assignments and participation, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are uniformly positive, emphasizing care, motivation, fair work, and a welcoming class atmosphere.

Main concern

Students need consistent participation to get the most out of the course.

What students said

“ so far.”
ES005
“ .”
ES006A
“Consistency is what Professor Basso needs from you if you want to change your health goals.”
ES293

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so far. So encouraging and truly cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Amazing course, outstanding teacher!”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“She cares about the quality of her instruction, her students and actually takes the time to listen.”

📚 Workload

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Such a nice person!
  • So encouraging and truly cares about her students.
  • She cares about the quality of her instruction, her students and actually takes the time to listen.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Busso is fair, .
  • Shes passionate about the topics she teaches.
  • Atmosphere of the class was very welcoming.

Theme 3

📈 About Effort

  • .
  • The work wasn't hard, understandable, fresh.
  • Consistency is what Professor Basso needs from you if you want to change your health goals.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed and consistent reviews support the rating, but the sample size is small.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ES0052 reviews
ES2932 reviews
HED1582 reviews
ES006A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values