AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katherine Muckle

MATH280 · MATH285 · MATH088 · MATH176 · MATH046 · MATH90 · MATH090 · MATH120 · MATH45 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle heavy , and a teaching style that some students find confusing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyHeavy HomeworkCaring But PolarizingTough GraderAccessible Outside Class
  • Students consistently describe the classes as .
  • Many and accessible, but teaching clarity is inconsistent.
  • Retakes, , and help are available, but the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A , and , but students repeatedly say exams are hard and the workload is demanding.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students describe the math content as hard, fast, test-heavy, and sometimes above the expected curriculum.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews warn that skipping class can .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend her for caring support but many strongly warn against her because of , and .

The and sharply split between praise and avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grading feels strict because many grades and occasional .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and substantial weekly practice.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

She is often described as caring and available, but many students .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The course , and test performance, with homework often used as practice or .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for her caring attitude but , and confusing pacing.

Main concern

and heavy workload can overwhelm students even when she offers help and retakes.

What students said

“The class average on tests should not be 40%.”
MATH285
“There is A LOT of homework.”
MATH088
“She cares A LOT about your success.”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a strict exam-heavy structure with , and at least one mention of a formula sheet.

Test HeavyHard ExamsFormula SheetExam RetakesHigh-Stakes Final

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly describe hard, frequent, high-weight exams, but .

Test HeavyHard ExamsFormula SheetExam RetakesHigh-Stakes Final
“ , and does provide a formula sheet for tests.”
MATH280
“your whole .”
MATH176
“Her finals are crucial, being a good 30%+ of your grade.”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She means well I know this, but her teaching style is awful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

45/100

“She means well I know this, but her teaching style is awful.”

28/100

“The class average on tests should not be 40%.”

Workload Load

24/100

“There is A LOT of homework.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • .
  • her teaching style is so confusing.
  • her lessons are scrambled, fast and

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class average on tests should not be 40%.
  • your whole .
  • because she jumps around a lot with chapters.

Theme 3

About Support

  • She cares A LOT about your success.
  • Very easy to talk to and ask for help from.
  • She had office hours after class, and answered emails pretty quickly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 detailed reviews over several years show consistent patterns in , and teaching clarity.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH2806 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
MATH0902 reviews
MATH1762 reviews
MATH902 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH0461 review
MATH0881 review
MATH2851 review
MATH451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 5