AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jonathan Trinidad

ANTH215 · SOC215 · PSY215 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a clear and and can attend class consistently.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear statistics teacherExtra creditAttendance requiredExam-based gradingSupportive
  • Students say he makes statistics understandable even for people who dislike math.
  • The course rewards attendance, notes, packet study, and .
  • Recommendation is extremely strong, with students repeatedly calling him one of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Students report , and even non-math students earning A grades, but attendance and studying are still required.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Statistics can be intimidating, but students say he breaks problems down clearly and makes the material understandable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as required or essential because lectures contain the course information.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes statistics feel manageable.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and manageable exams make grades favorable for students who attend and study.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The workload is structured around lectures, packets, exams, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and unusually effective at teaching statistics.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Several reviews say grades are mainly or and packets used for preparation.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe a clear, structured, lecture-based statistics class with manageable exams and strong support.

Main concern

because key information comes from lecture.

What students said

“His lectures are easy to follow and understand.”
PSY215
“All info comes from lectures so don't miss class.”
SOC215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but are described as manageable and sometimes easy when students study lecture material.

Exam-Based GradesMultiple ChoiceTrue Or FalseFree ResponseReview Before Exam

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exam-based grading with manageable question types and , but .

Exam-Based GradesMultiple ChoiceTrue Or FalseFree ResponseReview Before Exam
“ ! Multiple choice, true and false, and a couple free response.”
PSY215
“ .”
SOC215

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am not a math person, and I passed with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He made stats actually really enjoyable and very understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ .”

📚

88/100

“grade is based off of exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His .
  • He takes you step by step on how to solve a problem.
  • he made it relatable to job fields.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Study for an hour beforehand and youll be fine.
  • !
  • Easy A!

Theme 3

🧭

  • !
  • All info comes from lectures so don't miss class.
  • only time you'll get the info is in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistent in-person reviews across several terms give , and grades.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY2153 reviews
ANTH2152 reviews
SOC2152 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values