AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Laurie Leblanc

CHEM120 · CHEM115 · CHEMCHEM · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless , and a demanding chemistry class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingStrict deadlinesDifficult testsUnclear expectationsPolarizing teaching
  • Most students describe the course experience as harsh, stressful, and .
  • Some students say she knows chemistry and can teach clearly, but the negative reviews are stronger and more frequent.
  • , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and grade penalties for small technical issues.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is demanding, and , and fast coursework make it harder.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and punctuality appear strict because students report zeros or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise against taking her because the , and classroom treatment feel punitive.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly describe her as a very hard or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload feels heavy because labs, textbook learning, technical rules, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students say she teaches chemistry clearly, but most reviews focus on rudeness, inconsistency, and poor student experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and textbook learning, so assessment is not purely exam-based.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly negative overall, with repeated complaints , and rude behavior.

Main concern

Strict technical rules and the content.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM120
“ !!”
CHEM120
“Professor LeBlanc grades very strictly to the .”
CHEM120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and lab rules are strict, with and severe penalties for late lab work.

Hard TestsStrict Lab DeadlinesPre-Lab PenaltiesPost-Lab Penalties

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict lab deadline penalties, but do not prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsStrict Lab DeadlinesPre-Lab PenaltiesPost-Lab Penalties
“ !!”
CHEM120
“ class starts otherwise you will get a zero.”
CHEM120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

8/100

“Professor LeBlanc grades very strictly to the .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She teaches the material fine, but dealing with her is the hardest part of the class.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • She is a .
  • class starts otherwise you will get a zero.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests And Labs

  • !!
  • you will be fighting just to get a C in her class.
  • I dropped her class because I would have failed off one of her technicalities.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but and you have to ask her after class to understand better.
  • She skims through the coursework and expects you to learn 95% from the textbook.
  • she 100% teaches her subject and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews provide consistent warnings, but several are old and some opinions conflict about her teaching quality.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1206 reviews
1201 review
CHEM1151 review
CHEMCHEM1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1