AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Jamie Steck

CSIS293 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Consider Steck only if you are comfortable with a test-heavy class and can learn independently when teaching is uneven.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring but unevenTest heavyStraightforward examsManageable assignmentsLimited evidence
  • but weak at teaching, while the other calls her very good and organized.
  • Assignments appear manageable if students pay attention, and as straightforward in the positive review.
  • Confidence is low because only two in .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A seems achievable because and tests reuse quiz questions, but the .

All evidence comes from two in person reviews because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is straightforward for attentive students, but the difficulty rating and teaching concerns keep it from being clearly easy.

All evidence comes from two in person reviews because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews do not prove a , but paying attention appears important for assignments and exams.

All evidence comes from two in person reviews because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split evenly because and and structure.

All evidence comes from two in person reviews because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

The , but there is not enough detail to call it generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Assignments are described as not too difficult, but the .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from two in person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with one review praising her and the other saying she needs to improve her teaching skills.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from two in person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Both tags and , including a midterm and final.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from two in person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In and praise for caring, straightforward structure.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching quality in a .

What students said

“Although she is a nice and teaching skills.”
CSIS293
“ and final, very straightforward material, .”
CSIS293

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and test-heavy, with some student-friendly predictability from reused quiz questions.

Two TestsMidtermFinalQuestions Reused From Online Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention two tests, a midterm, a final, and reused online quiz questions, but .

Two TestsMidtermFinalQuestions Reused From Online Quizzes
“ and final, very straightforward material, .”
CSIS293

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although she is a nice and teaching skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split in teaching quality and test-heavy structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Very good teacher and cares genuinely about the topic.”

🧪 Assessment Style

82/100

“ and final, very straightforward material, .”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

50/100

“Unless this is the only class .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Although she is a nice and teaching skills.
  • Very good teacher and cares genuinely about the topic.

Theme 2

🧪

  • the if you pay attention.
  • and final, very straightforward material, .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

, and they sharply disagree, so any conclusion has limited reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSIS2932 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values