AI Rate Professor

Music

Ken Anderson

MUS95G · VOICEMUSI · MUS132 · MUS174 · MUSIC170 · MUS170 · VOICESECT · MUS175 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you value a , but be aware that participation and fit with his style may matter a lot.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind MentorFun ClassMusic ExpertiseParticipation MattersMixed Tone
  • Most reviews describe Ken Anderson as , and deeply helpful.
  • The course appears easy for students who participate and try, with .
  • One recent review is sharply negative and reports yelling, discouragement, and strict consequences for skipping.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reviews describe the class as pretty easy and grading as flexible if students try, but participation and performance effort still matter.

All Easy A because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students call the class fun, interesting, and easy if they pay attention, though performance expectations require effort.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person music reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

The newest review says skipping class can make him write students off, and the tags warn that skipping means students will not pass.

, and they show a strict participation expectation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and musical support, but the newest review strongly warns against taking him.

All recommendation evidence is in-person, with mostly older praise and one recent severe negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

The as long as students try in performance tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Reviews describe the class as easy if students pay attention, with no repeated complaints about heavy workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Most students praise his kindness, patience, humor, and music expertise, but one recent review reports disrespect and yelling.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person, and the main contrast is between older strong praise and one recent harsh complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments point to performance tests, memorization, singing practice, and participation rather than written exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

kindness, humor, talent, and support, but one review reports a harsh and discouraging experience.

Main concern

The newest review warns that skipping or poor fit with his demeanor can create a bad experience.

What students said

“ .”
MUS132
“The .”
MUS170
“Very fun and interesting! pretty easy class if you pay attention.”
MUSIC170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention performance tests but do not clearly prove traditional exam .

Performance TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove traditional exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterms, or finals.

Performance TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Grades pretty flexible as long as you try in every category of the performance tests.”
MUS132

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and conflicting student experiences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“The .”

⚖️

80/100

“Grades pretty flexible as long as you try in every category of the performance tests.”

⚠️

18/100

“If as a slacker.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ken is so kind and patient and as well as outside it.
  • Awesome teacher! He's so funny, and so nice, and he loves teaching.
  • Enthusiastic about Gospel and teaching, wonderful man and teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very fun and interesting! pretty easy class if you pay attention.
  • Grades pretty flexible as long as you try in every category of the performance tests.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • Disrespectful and at times would yell and discourage other students from succeeding in this class and in music in general.
  • If as a slacker.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews show a strong positive pattern, but many are old and one recent review sharply conflicts with the older praise.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUS1703 reviews
MUS1321 review
MUS1741 review
MUS1751 review
MUS95G1 review
Show 3 more courses
MUSIC1701 review
VOICEMUSI1 review
VOICESECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1