AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Olga Pilipets

MATHLAB · MATH6105 · MATH88 · MATH285 · MATH160 · MATH103 · MATH90 · MATH090 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MARG110 · MATH175 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning math independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesFrequent mistakesOnline homework heavyHelpful but inconsistentMixed grading experience
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, but and frequent mistakes.
  • Some students find the class easy because , and can help grades.
  • Students who can self-teach may survive .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be , and practice tests, but poor teaching can add effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with several comments .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Many students call the class easy or passable, but it should.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others suggest students can rely on online systems or self-study.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Many students do not recommend her because , and full of mistakes.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Repeatable online homework, take-home quizzes, makeups, and make grades .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and clunky systems.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Although some students find her kind and , and weak preparation.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests as recurring grade components.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe an inconsistent math and flexible but often gives with many mistakes.

Main concern

The biggest concern is unclear teaching that .

What students said

“This is not that difficult of a subject, yet .”
MATH160
“She is a nice person but a horrible teacher.”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with comments mentioning online exams, take-home quizzes, practice tests, and but .

Online Exams MentionedTake-Home QuizzesPractice TestsTests Can Be Tough

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and tough tests without clearly proving book policy or proctoring.

Online Exams MentionedTake-Home QuizzesPractice TestsTests Can Be Tough
“The good thing about the class were the ”
MATH160
“exams, and ”
MATH160
“ and make up most of your grade”
MATH090

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not that difficult of a subject, yet .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Does a very poor job of explaining concepts, basically just copies lecture notes on the board.”

📈 Grade Path

62/100

“Do the , and you shouldn't get anything lower than a C.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“0/10 would not recommend.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Halfway through lectures, she realizes she is doing the problem incorrectly.
  • She makes ALOT of mistakes which to me is unprofessional.
  • Her accent and way of

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Systems

  • because you can do it over and over to get a full grade.
  • .
  • The online system she uses is EXTREMELY difficult at first

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • she offers 10%
  • and truly give you a tests.
  • so you better study.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across a long time span provide broad evidence, though opinions vary by course and year.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH16011 reviews
MATH1105 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
MATH0903 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH882 reviews
901 review
MARG1101 review
MATH1751 review
MATH2851 review
MATH61051 review
MATH901 review
MATHLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1