AI Rate Professor

Geology

Jennifer Duncan

GEOL110 · GEOL104 · GEO110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are ready for a very demanding geology course with and little margin for error.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery hard examsHeavy homeworkTough gradingPoor explanationsStrict attendance pressure
  • Students consistently describe the course as extremely difficult with and .
  • and getting an A is unlikely without major effort.
  • and clear, but the overall recommendation is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and failed or low grades.

review stressing harsh exams and in-person reviews stressing attendance and homework.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content is described as boring, difficult, test-heavy, and hard to understand without detailed notes.

In-person evidence focuses on difficult content, while the online review adds that the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because one review says you cannot miss class and another tag says skipping means you will not pass.

Attendance pressure is supported by in-person reviews only, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students explicitly advise against taking her because of , and overwhelming difficulty.

Both online and review recommending the class for highly committed students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Multiple reviews call her a tough or and the reported grades include withdrawal and D-level outcomes.

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and the need to study intensely.

Format shift

and attendance, while the online review adds textbook-heavy preparation.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Most reviews say she is unclear, unhelpful, or and clear.

Format shift

The online review is strongly negative about communication, while positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The course appears test-heavy, with and reading.

Format shift

Online evidence directly mentions exams, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe heavy , and difficult content.

Main concern

Missing class or falling behind can seriously hurt performance.

What students said

“Almost everyone in the class failed it so I as a teacher.”
GEOL104
“You cannot , and you have to STUDY.”
GEOL104

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and unhelpful materials.

Main concern

Students may struggle because help and .

What students said

“Her exams were very hard, each around 100 questions.”
GEOL110
“Asked for help many times & she did't respond, when she did she was rude to me.”
GEOL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyAbout 100 Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult class, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Test HeavyHard Class
“It's the .”
GEOL104
“this is one of the hardest classes I've taken.”
GEOL104

Online

The and around 100 questions, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Hard ExamsAbout 100 Questions
“Her exams were very hard, each around 100 questions.”
GEOL110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Almost everyone in the class failed it so I as a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ ”

📉 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“I as a teacher.”

⚖️

10/100

“Graded Harsh. .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • she literally gives out a lot of homework
  • You cannot , and you have to STUDY.

Theme 2

📝

  • Her exams were very hard, each around 100 questions.
  • She is a and I would not recommend this class to someones who is trying to get an easy A

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across several years are consistent about difficulty and grading, though the sample is small and somewhat old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

GEOL1042 reviews
GEO1101 review
GEOL1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1