AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Todor Kitchev

MATH176 · MATH281 · MATH171 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take him if you want serious math instruction and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDetailed ExplanationsLots of HomeworkTough GraderTest HeavyLecture Heavy
  • and willingness to answer questions.
  • Grades and as tough, especially in higher math courses.
  • Success depends heavily on doing substantial work outside class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students describe lots of , and little grade cushioning.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is demanding, with trig, polar equations, and application-heavy material requiring outside study.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students warn that skipping class .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend him for clear lectures but hesitate because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several students call him a tough grader, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most reviews say he explains clearly and answers questions, but .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students repeatedly mention hard tests and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but a demanding workload and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Professor Kitchev answered all the questions presented to him with great detail and examples.”
math176
“Very tough .”
math176
“Todor gives great lectures and is very good at explaining the subject.”
MATH281

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyExam Preparation Classes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some class time used for exam preparation.

Hard TestsTest HeavyExam Preparation Classes
“Very tough .”
math176
“Uses 1-2 classes before each exam to prepare you for the .”
MATH171
“Unfortunately, and he is a .”
MATH281

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Kitchev answered all the questions presented to him with great detail and examples.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Todor gives great lectures and is very good at explaining the subject.”

⚖️

35/100

“Very tough .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Also, he is a , so be prepared to do lots of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Kitchev answered all the questions presented to him with great detail and examples.
  • He's a smart dude and knows what he's talking about (as far as the math goes).
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't use any of your time outside of class to understanding these concepts, you will fail, regardless of your professor.
  • Very tough .
  • Unfortunately, and he is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews span recent and older courses with consistent themes, but the sample is small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

math1762 reviews
MATH2812 reviews
MATH1711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1