AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lesya Zhukovska

MATH120 · MATH100 · MATH92 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her only if you can handle a polarizing classroom style in exchange for curves, , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra creditPolarizing teachingLots of homeworkTest heavyEnergetic lectures
  • Reviews are and rude or dismissive interactions.
  • Grades can be helped by curves and , but homework and .
  • There is no online evidence, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Curves, , and homework-based exam questions make high grades attainable, but the workload and uneven support keep it from being effortless.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Some students found the class very easy to pass, but , and difficult help-seeking.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance does not appear strictly documented, but , and participation comments make showing up useful.

and is not clearly strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students love her energy and while others strongly dislike her attitude toward questions.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

because reviews repeatedly mention curves, , and exam questions drawn from homework.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload is heavy because negative tags and comments mention lots of homework and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, with energetic clear lectures for some students and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment appears exam-heavy, supported by comments about exams, study guides, test-heavy tags, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

reviews about energy and grading support and two negative reviews about rudeness and unclear help.

Main concern

Students who need patient explanations may struggle with her response to questions.

What students said

“The material ”
MATH100
“she was perhaps the rudest professor I have ever had.”
MATH92
“ and ”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard but student-friendly in content because comments mention curves, , and questions from homework, with .

Exam Questions From HomeworkExtra Credit On ExamsCurved ExamsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and homework-aligned questions, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Curved ExamsExtra Credit On ExamsHomework-Aligned Exams
“ and ”
MATH120
“we literally got some questions straight from the exam”
MATH100
“ ”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Most energetic professor I have ever had with so much passion for math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting the and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Whenever you would ask her a question, she gives you a dirty look and makes you feel stupid for asking.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

50/100

“Most entertaining math educator I have ever had in my life and has so much energy early in the morning!”

⚖️

88/100

“Every homework assignment and and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most entertaining math educator I have ever had in my life and has so much energy early in the morning!
  • she was perhaps the rudest professor I have ever had.
  • She also gets off topic a lot too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class was unbelievably easy to pass.
  • and
  • there are multiple opportunities.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Homework

  • The material
  • The study guides that she creates for the .l either.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 4 in-person reviews exist and they are detailed but strongly divided.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1202 reviews
MATH1001 review
MATH921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values