AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul Brock

MATH176 · MATH99 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

He looks worthwhile for students who attend and practice, but the small sample makes the rating uncertain.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunnyHelpfulForgiving gradingPractice testsAttendance useful
  • Both reviews describe him as funny and respected or helpful.
  • but includes forgiving methods and an easy A comment.
  • , but students learn more by going.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

One student says easy A and , but another says you really work for the grade and reported an F.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is learnable with practice tests and attendance, but math still requires real work.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

One review says he does not enforce roll, though attending helps learning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Despite the recorded would-take-again data, the comments are mostly positive about his humor, help, and grading.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

and easy A, while another says students must work for the grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but students are expected to practice and work for the grade.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Reviews describe him as funny, helpful, and effective when students attend.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Pop quizzes and practice tests are mentioned, but the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his humor and help, with one saying he makes students work and .

Main concern

Evidence is limited to only two reviews with mixed grade signals.

What students said

“super funny makes you really work for a grade”
MATH99
“Funny, genuinely tries to help his students.”
MATH176
“Very forgiving with .”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention practice tests and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, or proctoring policies.

Practice TestsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but not specific exam rules.

Practice TestsPop Quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH99
“ .”
MATH176

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Funny, genuinely tries to help his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Funny, genuinely tries to help his students.”

📈 Grade Effort

70/100

“super funny makes you really work for a grade”

⚖️

75/100

“Very forgiving with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super funny makes you really work for a grade
  • Funny, genuinely tries to help his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Very forgiving with .
  • Easy A.

Theme 3

📝 About Assessment

  • Beware of pop quizzes
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are several years apart with limited detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1761 review
MATH991 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values