AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Kathleen Robles

ANTHRO120 · CULAN2043 · ANTHR103 · ANTH120 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you can handle readings, essay exams, and note-taking, but if lateness or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerTest HeavyStudy Guides HelpLate To ClassMixed Student Fit
  • Many students praise her passion, knowledge, and useful study guides.
  • The class is test-heavy and reading-heavy, with essays and .
  • Reviews are polarized, especially around lateness, lecture style, and perceived professionalism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is very reachable with study guides, notes, and readings, but students warn against procrastinating and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Anthropology concepts are usually understandable, but the , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

and exam preparation, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and learning, but many dislike the workload, lateness, or lecture style.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong, but comments , and the need to prepare carefully.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload is heavy because students repeatedly , and test preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

67/100

Her teaching is praised as passionate and knowledgeable by many, but criticized as late, boring, or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment is strongly exam-centered, with multiple , and finals.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, combining strong praise for passion and study guides with repeated , and boring lectures.

Main concern

The main risk is a test-heavy class with , and inconsistent classroom experience.

What students said

“ and you're golden.”
ANTH120
“ ”
ANTH120
“She was late to all classes but 3 the whole semester.”
ANTH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are demanding and essay-heavy but supported by study guides that often signal what to prepare.

Test HeavyEssay QuestionsStudy GuidesTimed ExamsQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, short answers, essays, quizzes, and study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyEssay QuestionsStudy GuidesTimed ExamsQuizzes
“ ”
ANTH120
“we only have 1 hour 15 mins to do a multiple choice (25 questions) and written test.”
ANTH120
“ .”
ANTH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and you're golden.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“She's a great teacher who teaches interesting topics, it's honestly such a fun class.”

🧪

45/100

“ ”

⚖️ Grade Effort

72/100

“ and you're golden.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is easy to follow and I didn't get bored.
  • She was late to all classes but 3 the whole semester.
  • All she did was read straight from the book and talk about her personal life.

Theme 2

🧪

  • .
  • Gives .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • and you're golden.
  • you can't procrastinate and do things last minute, very heavy load.
  • As long as you use the review sheet and study hard the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two in-person reviews across many years give rich evidence, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH12028 reviews
ANTHRO1202 reviews
ANTHR1031 review
CULAN20431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

14

A 14

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1