AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Tamara Byk

CHEM115 · CHEM200L · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready for a demanding chemistry class with and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyHard to UnderstandCaring but Demanding
  • Most reviews describe , and .
  • A few students say she is caring and .
  • The main risk is a and strict assessment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments say the A , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content feels difficult because students mention fast coverage, memorization, computations, and lecture-heavy delivery.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though frequent quizzes and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking the class because of , and .

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and one review says she does not grade on a curve.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and lab reports.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few students find her caring and helpful, but most describe lectures as and hard to understand.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments frequently mention quizzes, tests, exams, and study guides, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, heavy work, frequent tests, and difficulty understanding lectures.

Main concern

Students repeatedly warn that the workload and .

What students said

“ . Ridiculous amounts of .”
CHEM115
“All she did was read from the slides. ”
CHEM115
“ and exams. Stay away if possible.”
CHEM115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent and hard quizzes or exams, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Frequent QuizzesTest HeavyHard ExamsNo Curve Clearly Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or final format rules.

Frequent QuizzesTest HeavyHard Exams
“ .”
CHEM115
“ . .”
CHEM115
“Lots of , and lab reports.”
CHEM115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Ridiculous amounts of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“All she did was read from the slides.”

⚖️

18/100

“She is a but she also answers any questions and does not mind at all helping you if you do not understand.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Lots of , and lab reports.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are literally word by word from the if you need to miss class.
  • She has a heavy accent so we never understand her.
  • Dr. Byk puts a lot of effort on her teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very hard class. . Stay Away
  • Doesn't grade on a curve.
  • and exams.

Theme 3

🧪 About Workload and Tests

  • .
  • By the third week of school we we're already taking an exam covering 5 chapters.
  • The only downside is the but very tedious.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 detailed in-person reviews over multiple terms show consistent patterns in , and lectures.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM11510 reviews
CHEM200L2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values