AI Rate Professor

Political Science

David Chadwick-Brown

POLSC · POLISCI121 · PSCI120 · POLI102 · POSCI121 · POSC121 · POSC101 · POSC120 · POLISCI120 · PLOSCI120 · POLISCI · POLSCI121 · POLYSCI121 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid David Chadwick-Brown unless you are a highly independent political science student who can tolerate long lectures and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture HeavyExtremely Hard TestsNo Study GuidesBoring LecturesPoor Test Alignment
  • Most students say he is knowledgeable but ineffective, boring, and .
  • Tests are described as very difficult, vague, lecture-dependent, and poorly supported by study materials.
  • The class is a bad fit for course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

An A is very difficult because grades depend .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Intro political science feels much harder than expected because , and poorly aligned with exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

because exams rely on lecture details that students say the book does not cover well.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because the , and punishing.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tests are repeatedly described as brutally hard, though a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Homework may be limited, but , and difficult exams make the workload feel high.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students recognize his knowledge but consistently criticize boring lectures, weak structure, poor clarity, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

94/100

Reviews repeatedly say grades come mainly or and readings.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe long , and little guidance despite his subject knowledge.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say exams are extremely hard and not well supported by lectures, textbooks, or study guides.

What students said

“one of the .”
POSC121
“No study guide or .”
POLISCI121
“The book is very large and hard to read and there is no study guide and the .”
PLOSCI120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support difficult lecture-based exams with no study guide, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyNo Study GuideLecture-Based ExamsHard Multiple ChoiceMini Essays

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, fill-in-the-blank, and mini-essay formats with little review support.

Test HeavyNo Study GuideMultiple ChoiceFill In BlankMini Essays
“ and fill in blank but questions were vague and random and sexist.”
POLISCI121
“his tests are 50 multiple choice questions with 3 mini-essays!”
POLI102
“There is no study guide for the test and the .”
POLSC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No study guide or .”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He is extremely knowledgeable but can't seem to properly lecture without making me want to sleep.”

🧪

18/100

“ and fill in blank but questions were vague and random and sexist.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

14/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just stands in front of the class and lectures.
  • He has a lot of knowledge but his lectures are long, boring, and he tends to go off topic during the lecture
  • All this guy does is lecture the whole class period.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • all the hard
  • No study guide or .
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Class Structure

  • The book is very large and hard to read and there is no study guide and the .
  • Neither his lectures or the no review at all.
  • Do not depend on him for the info you need for tests,because he doesn't give it to you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

There are 30 reviews across many years with strong consistency , and poor course structure.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 511

Course coverage

POSC12110 reviews
POLISCI1215 reviews
PLOSCI1202 reviews
POLI1022 reviews
POLISCI2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
1211 review
POLISCI1201 review
POLSC1 review
POLSCI1211 review
POLYSCI1211 review
POSC1011 review
POSC1201 review
POSCI1211 review
PSCI1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values