AI Rate Professor

English

Margaret Vanblaricom

ENG98 · ENGL7163 · ENG110 · ENG110AND98 · ENG098 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and and attendance expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderEssay HeavyStrict DeadlinesUseful Writing SkillsChallenging
  • Students consistently describe her grading as .
  • The class can improve writing skills for students who accept a challenge.
  • , and workload expectations feel unforgiving to many students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is possible, but students say it , and meeting strict essay expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content is writing-heavy and often described as harder than expected for introductory English.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and deadlines appear strict, with one student saying missed class can lead to being dropped.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

but warn easy-grade seekers away because of and workload.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple students call her one of the hardest graders they have had, especially on essays.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report many essays, demanding writing, and assignments that require steady effort.

Format shift

Workload comments are only from in-person classes.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some students say she teaches useful writing skills, but .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and heavy writing rather than a single assessment type.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding writing teacher with , and some real learning value.

Main concern

and heavy writing make the course risky for students seeking an easy grade.

What students said

“Seriously the .”
ENG098
“ if you are lazy or expect an easy A.”
ENG110AND98

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and essays, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Tests MentionedEssay HeavyBook-Based Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays, but do not clearly prove the exact exam rules or proctoring style.

Tests MentionedEssay Heavy
“you can get an A on the tests.”
ENG098
“You won't be tested on them.”
ENG110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are lazy or expect an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Vanblaricom is a great professor even though she is a .”

⚖️

18/100

“Seriously the .”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“be prepared to write a LOT of essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Vanblaricom is a great professor even though she is a .
  • She taught me a lot, and made me a better writer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • NOT AN .
  • if you want an

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • be prepared to write a LOT of essays.
  • The writings are difficult to ace but do able.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across and workload signals, though many are old and some lack grades.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG0983 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENG110AND981 review
ENG981 review
ENGL71631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1