AI Rate Professor

Media Arts

Ruth Eggett

MCOM110 · MCOMM110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can learn from the textbook and tolerate heavy writing, because .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBook-based testsDisorganized lecturesHeavy writingStrict rulesMixed online experience
  • little beyond the textbook.
  • Grades can be high, but students report heavy writing, strict rules, and textbook-dependent tests.
  • The single online review is much more positive and mentions interesting projects and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

High grades are possible, but students still describe lots of , and strict course rules.

The online review suggests and manageable work, while and more frustration.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The subject can be manageable, but tests based on the textbook and grades suggest.

Online students found the material interesting, while and hard to use.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because reviews mention showing up, strict rules, and that skipping class can hurt passing.

The online review mentions participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because most in-person reviews describe poor organization, pointless lectures, and frustrating rules.

The only online review is highly recommended, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grades can be high, but students , and strict course expectations.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions , while and textbook-dependent tests.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and daily work pressure.

Format shift

Both formats mention writing, but the in-person 8-week course sounds especially time-consuming.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Most in-person comments describe lectures as boring, scattered, or pointless, despite one strong online review.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised in one review, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and textbook-based tests.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes writing and media projects, while , and book-based tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing boring lectures, disorganization, strict rules, and .

Main concern

Students say lectures are not useful and passing depends heavily on the textbook and completing work.

What students said

“Her lectures are purely off of the book so they were pretty boring.”
MCOM110
“Her lectures are pretty much pointless.”
MCOM110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is very positive, with , and despite lots of writing.

Main concern

The evidence is limited to one positive online review and .

What students said

“Although there were lots of projects like participating in karaoke using a smartphone application.”
MCOMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest tests and quizzes are strict and heavily tied to the textbook, but they .

Textbook-based testsPop quizzesStrict rules

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Textbook-based testsPop quizzes
“Maybe 3 out of the 50 questions that are on the from the book.”
MCOM110
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MCOM110

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures are pretty much pointless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“We were given plenty of time consuming assignments since it was an 8-week course.”

👍 Recommendation Split

35/100

“ if you need it and are prepared to do plenty of writing everyday.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are purely off of the book so they were pretty boring.
  • She is extremely scattered and all-over-the-place.
  • She couldn't even read her own notes about her lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy class as long as you show up and do all the work.
  • You will not pass without it because the notes.
  • Although there were lots of projects.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but older evidence, with and one conflicting online review.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MCOM1103 reviews
MCOMM1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1