AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vi Trang

MATH170 · MATH160 · MATH110 · MATH45 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take Vi Trang only if you can keep up with fast , and self-correct when tests feel different from practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFast PacedHeavy HomeworkMixed Teaching QualityTough TestsHelpful When Clear
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising detailed help and others finding the class confusing and test-heavy.
  • The course is intellectually challenging because lectures move fast and .
  • Getting an A is possible with major studying and , but it is not a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible through lots of studying and , but and hard tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students , and too much material to absorb during class.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review directly warns that skipping class will make passing unlikely, and the course appears lecture-dependent.

, and they imply attendance is important.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, but others warn that tests, pacing, and explanations can be frustrating.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

can help, but as tough and not well matched to practice material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

and needing a lot of study time to keep up.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching feedback and complaints about fast, unclear lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments , and homework as the main assessment pressure.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a demanding math class with , and inconsistent test preparation.

Main concern

Students often struggle with , and .

What students said

“This class was hard, but got me an A+.”
MATH160
“He covers too much and moves on too fast.”
MATH110
“none of the ”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poor alignment to practice material, but exam security rules are not proven.

Tough TestsPractice-Test MismatchOddly Phrased Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mismatched practice material, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Tough TestsPractice-Test MismatchOddly Phrased Questions
“the questions on the and are hard to understand”
MATH170
“study guides he posts, constantly have mistakes and they would never match up to the test”
MATH110
“is a very tough tester”
110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Intense fast paced, if you are not ahead of what's taught, you won't have time to absorb it and ask questions in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and testing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“He took the time to break everything down to the core.”

📈 Effort For Grades

38/100

“This class was hard, but got me an A+.”

⚠️ Test Difficulty

35/100

“none of the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He took the time to break everything down to the core.
  • Never can ask a question and get an answer.
  • if you need the help.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Pace

  • I did study A LOT
  • SO .
  • He covers too much and moves on too fast.

Theme 3

📝 About Tests

  • .
  • Hard to listen to, classes are long and boring and is a very tough tester.
  • the questions on the and are hard to understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews across several years provide consistent difficulty themes, but opinions on teaching quality are divided.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
1101 review
MATH1601 review
MATH1701 review
MATH451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1