AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Miriam Pollack

ESL2796 · ESL102 · LANG121 · ESL105 · ENG103 · ESL103 · ESL2787 · ESL4668 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent teaching experiences, heavy writing, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingHelpful To SomeHeavy WritingStrict GradingBoring Lectures
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her caring and students who found her ineffective.
  • Several negative reviews cite unclear writing , and difficult tests.
  • Positive , and wants students to learn.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A appears hard because students , and strict grade cutoffs.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course feels challenging because writing, tests, and .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are only in-person reviews, and they do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because strong praise is offset , and poor learning outcomes.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several students describe low , and too much graded writing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention , and test-heavy work, making the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with many students praising her care and others .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise from some students and severe , and tests.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent teaching quality, heavy writing, and grades that some students view as unforgiving.

What students said

“She is a nice teacher but she makes you write a lot of and practicing how to write them BEFORE giving grades.”
ESL103
“ regret it.”
ESL2787
“she is the life.”
ESL103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests tougher tests and time pressure, but reviews .

Test HeavyLong TestsShort Time Limits

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and short time limits, but not specific proctoring or book rules.

Test HeavyLong TestsShort Time Limits
“TEST HEAVY”
ESL103
“ , and she gives very short time.”
102
“dont underestimte the to get an "A"”
LANG121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a nice teacher but she makes you write a lot of and practicing how to write them BEFORE giving grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

55/100

“She teaches very good makes you understand every piece of lecture.”

28/100

“she gives the grade so ”

Recommendation Risk

38/100

“ . you will waste your time.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She is wonderful teacher I've ever had, so friendly.
  • she does not know how to explian the subjct
  • She talks too much in class, she is not a good teacher; you will learn more by yourself.

Theme 2

Difficulty And Grades

  • I was working hard all the semester and , but Unfortunately my final grade was a 69.39%
  • dont underestimte the to get an "A"
  • she gives the grade so

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

but polarized evidence, with enough detail to identify consistent risks.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESL10313 reviews
ESL1023 reviews
ESL1052 reviews
1021 review
ENG1031 review
Show 4 more courses
ESL27871 review
ESL27961 review
ESL46681 review
LANG1211 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values