AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Wood

MATH160 · MATH110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take him only if , and tolerate .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring but confusingLecture heavyHard testsAccessible outside classRequires homework
  • Students describe him as kind and available outside class.
  • Lectures are often long, mistake-prone, and .
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears to require steady homework and strong test preparation, with .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call the material theoretical and dry, and make the content harder to learn.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review directly says skipping class means you will not pass, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students appreciate his kindness, but most comments warn that lectures and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and effort-based passing suggest strict .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students say and lectures are long, creating a heavy workload for the rating set.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is caring and available, but repeated lecture mistakes and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

and homework, with tests carrying the strongest reported pressure.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a caring professor whose lecture clarity and .

Main concern

Students struggle with and .

What students said

“His lectures are long and you need to do the .”
MATH160
“He tends to mess up a lot whenever giving lectures which tends to confuse many students.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but do not prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Hard TestsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove specific exam rules or proctoring policies.

Hard TestsTest Heavy
“ but if you know the material you should be fine.”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He tends to mess up a lot whenever giving lectures which tends to confuse many students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“He tends to mess up a lot whenever giving lectures which tends to confuse many students.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“His lectures are long and you need to do the .”

❤️ Student Support

60/100

“He will make time to meet with you outside of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this class is too theoretical and dry.
  • He made constant mistakes and really was .
  • He tends to mess up a lot whenever giving lectures which tends to confuse many students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you need to do the .
  • but if you know the material you should be fine.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He will make time to meet with you outside of class.
  • he does seem to genuinely care for the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews are available, but , and hard tests.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1602 reviews
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values