AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Janet Gelb

CSIS142 · CSIS110 · CSIS · CSISCSIS · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you , and check every detail before submitting work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingUnclear instructionsPoor communicationTime-consuming assignmentsMixed support
  • Many students describe unclear directions, slow communication, and .
  • A few students did well when they followed every instruction closely and managed weekly deadlines.
  • Online evidence is especially negative, while in-person-labeled reviews include mixed comments about online-style coursework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Getting an A appears possible, but it requires careful self-teaching, strict attention to instructions, and avoiding small errors that .

Online reviews stress harsh grading, while students who completed everything carefully.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The software content can be straightforward, but Excel, Access, vague directions, and self-teaching make the course feel much harder.

Online and difficult by unclear instruction and limited support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some mention weekly deadlines and discussion participation.

Online evidence does not prove attendance rules, and than class attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students discourage taking her because , and stressful grading.

, while in-person evidence is mixed but still mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly report large deductions for minor or .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and often stressful because .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize final and grading pressure, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students call her helpful, but , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online evidence is very negative, while and mixed but still leans poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention assignments, weekly work, quizzes, discussion boards, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions a timed final, while in-person , and an on-campus final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but includes some older positive reviews from students who found the work straightforward.

Main concern

Students repeatedly cite vague instructions, slow responses, and .

What students said

“Constantly marked off LARGE amounts of and assignments done "incorrectly," despite the fact that the instructions were extremely ambiguous.”
CSIS110
“This class is terrible and combined, i am constantly confused.”
CSIS110
“The , but they do require a lot of time.”
CSIS110

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing little teaching, weak support, and .

Main concern

Students report poor communication and .

What students said

“Online teaching still requires teaching!”
CSIS110
“She was responsive when I emailed her(online course), but a .”
CSIS110
“Awful teacher. . Absolutely fruitless.”
CSIS110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but includes a and .

Timed FinalOn-Campus FinalWeekly QuizzesUnclear Final Handling

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

On-Campus FinalWeekly Quizzes
“the . gelb to show up to so she sent someone in her place.”
CSIS110
“ and you have to participate in the discussion board, but overall it was an easy class.”
CSIS110

Online

Online reviews mention a 100-question final in 60 minutes, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Timed Final
“She gave a 100 question final to do in 60 minutes 36 seconds for each question.”
CSIS110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Constantly marked off LARGE amounts of and assignments done "incorrectly," despite the fact that the instructions were extremely ambiguous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Janet has no interest in "teaching" you anything.”

⚖️

18/100

“She knocks 80% off your grade if you make a small mistake in naming the .”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“I would strongly recommend taking this class with another instructor to save yourself the hassle.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Online teaching still requires teaching!
  • She is completely lost and .
  • She is Unreasonable, you'll be judged by your name instead of the essence of your work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is no room for error.
  • .
  • Constantly marked off LARGE amounts of .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • I emailed her multiple times with no response.
  • .
  • The questions I had were answered quickly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 28 reviews over many years show repeated patterns of , and communication problems.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 510
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CSIS11024 reviews
CSIS2 reviews
CSIS1421 review
CSISCSIS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values