AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Firas Arabo

CSIS110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you dislike memorization-heavy tests and heavy homework.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyHeavy homeworkMemorization-basedGPA riskAttendance matters
  • The only review is strongly negative and says the course hurt the student's GPA.
  • The student describes many definitions, heavy testing, and lots of .
  • Because there is only one review, confidence is low even though the warning is severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

The only student barely earned a C and says the course damaged their GPA, so an A does not look easy from the available evidence.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The difficulty rating is low, but the comment describes memorizing many definitions and .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

The tag says skipping class means you .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only reviewer because it hurt their GPA.

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The only grade evidence is a C with a complaint that the course ruined the student's GPA.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The review includes a lots of and describes a frustrating workload tied to book definitions.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The student calls him a good man but strongly criticizes the course design and testing experience.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

The review and tags emphasize online tests, definitions, and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , homework-heavy, and damaging to GPA.

Main concern

The student reports memorization-heavy testing and a poor grade outcome.

What students said

“ !”
CSIS110
“It ruined my GPA! I barely get C.”
CSIS110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The with a short time limit.

Test HeavyTimed Online TestDefinition Memorization

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a 30-minute time pressure, but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Timed Online TestDefinition MemorizationTest Heavy
“U need to remember all definitions in the book.”
CSIS110
“answer the questions in 30 mnts.”
CSIS110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! It ruined my GPA! I barely get C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in testing, workload, and recommendation; credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recommendation Level

8/100

“ !”

🧪

20/100

“U need to remember all definitions in the book.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It ruined my GPA!
  • I barely get C.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • U need to remember all definitions in the book.
  • TEST HEAVY

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, although it is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSIS1101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values