AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marina Cohen

MATH141 · MATH176 · MATH96 · MATH103 · MATH096 · MATH110 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning math mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderSelf-teaching requiredLecture heavyDisorganized course flow
  • Students overwhelmingly say she does not teach clearly and often goes off topic.
  • Grades are risky because tests and expectations feel disconnected from class instruction.
  • Most reviews warn students to avoid her unless .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A looks very hard because students , and tests that do not match class.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The math content , and frequent off-topic lectures.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but students still say class time is often unhelpful or confusing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly do not recommend her because , and ineffective at teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple reviews tag her as a and describe failing or low grades despite effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly say she goes off topic, lacks a lesson plan, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and lecture-heavy structure, with exams creating the biggest grade risk.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing disorganized , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that students feel forced to teach themselves while .

What students said

“Did not teach me a single thing this semester.”
MATH096
“ .”
MATH141
“the little I learned was by myself.”
MATH176

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poor alignment with lectures, but they do not clearly prove book rules, proctoring, or .

Test HeavyTests Not Aligned With LecturesGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say tests are difficult and poorly aligned with class instruction, with .

Test HeavyTests Not Aligned With LecturesGraded By Few Things
“ .”
MATH141
“Not once have I failed a class until I had her...”
MATH096
“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”
MATH096

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Did not teach me a single thing this semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Did not teach me a single thing this semester.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ !!!”

📚 Self-Teaching Risk

15/100

“Basically this class is all about you learning from the book and not her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not have a lesson plan, and just jumps from one chapter to another
  • She never teaches the class.
  • She goes off topic far too often.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • One of my lowest grades this year.
  • Not once have I failed a class until I had her...
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • She's extremely distrespectful towards students
  • the little I learned was by myself.
  • Assingments were overwhelming.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 12 reviews over many years are highly consistent, though the sample size is moderate.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1764 reviews
MATH0962 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH962 reviews
MATH1031 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values