AI Rate Professor

Theater

Steve Schmitz

THTR115 · THTR120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Steve Schmitz if you want a passionate theatre mentor who will push you hard and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate About TheatrePushes StudentsHelpful CoachBlunt FeedbackInspiring
  • Students call him passionate, inspiring, and one of the .
  • He pushes performance quality and .
  • Workload and difficulty sit in the middle, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

He pushes students to excel and makes them work, so an A still requires real effort rather than coasting.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is consistently rated moderate, with challenge coming from performance expectations rather than abstract theory.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; others do not contradict a structured studio class.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students praise his passion and help, with .

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

He is helpful but blunt in critiques, so .

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students say he makes you work and pushes excellence without describing an .

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Described as , and thoroughly helpful despite occasional ego critiques.

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Theatre performance and individualized acting .

Format shift

Based solely on In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person theatre students praise his passion and individualized coaching, with some noting blunt acting critiques.

Main concern

and a self-focused vibe can feel harsh for sensitive performers.

What students said

“ . Really pushed me to excel.”
THTR120
“ , and comedic.”
THTR120
“Makes you work and .”
THTR115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on acting work and .

Performance BasedActing Critiques

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence centers on performance coaching and .

Performance BasedActing Critiques
“Makes you work and .”
THTR115
“Really pushed me to excel.”
THTR120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Really pushed me to excel. It's very obvious how passionate he is about theatre.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 In person reviews, highlighting passion, coaching, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Teaching Passion

80/100

“ . Really pushed me to excel.”

🛠️ Individual Coaching

78/100

“His help is thorough and unique to each person because every person in the class had different strengths and weaknesses.”

🗣️

48/100

“Makes you work and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really pushed me to excel.
  • , and comedic.
  • It's very obvious how passionate he is about theatre.

Theme 2

🎯

  • Makes you work and .
  • Seems really into himself, but helpful
  • His help is thorough and unique to each person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three in-person reviews from 2013-2016 are consistent on passion and coaching, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

THTR1202 reviews
THTR1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values